Cited by 22Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrailty in Older AdultsHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Association between postoperative complications and reoperation for patients undergoing geriatric surgery and the effect of reoperation on mortality

Chow, Warren B., Merkow, Ryan P., Cohen, Mark E., Bilimoria, Karl Y., Ko, Clifford Y.·2012·The American Surgeon™

Abstract

Elderly patients have greater risk for postoperative adverse events (PAEs). The study examines the rates of reoperation, the association between PAEs and reoperation, and the effect of reoperation on mortality for patients 65 years of age or older undergoing colorectal resections (CRRs), pancreatic resections (PRs), and lower extremity bypass (LEB) in 2010 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The models evaluating associations between reoperation and preoperative factors, PAEs, and mortality were developed using multiple logistic regression. The reoperation rates were 6.41 per cent for CRR (n = 11,084), 6.79 per cent for PR (n = 1,606), and 15.04 per cent for LEB (n = 4,170). Preoperative factors predicting reoperation included indications for surgery, procedure category, emergency status, and systemic sepsis. The PAEs most strongly associated with reoperation were wound dehiscence for CRR (odds ratio [OR], 15.286; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.035 to 21.175) and for PR (OR, 19.656; 8.677 to 44.531) and for LEB, graft failure (OR, 28.151; 18.030 to 43.954) and organ space surgical site infection (OR, 15.753; 6.938 to 35.711). Higher rates of mortality occurred with reoperation for patients undergoing CRR (16.88 vs 5.45%, P < 0.0001), PR (28.44 vs 2.14%, P < 0.0001), and LEB (6.22 vs 3.05%, P < 0.0001). For elderly patients undergoing general and vascular surgery, reoperation occurs frequently, is strongly associated with other PAEs, and may elevate risk of mortality for this vulnerable population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000313481207801028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chow, W. B., Merkow, R. P., Cohen, M. E., Bilimoria, K. Y., & Ko, C. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • American College of Surgeons (US)
Venue
The American Surgeon™
Published
2012-10
Volume
78
Issue
10
Pages
1137-1142
ISSN
  • 0003-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-9823
OpenAlex
W2421844719
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Surgeon (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
reoperation, postoperative complications, geriatric surgery, elderly patients, mortality, colorectal resection, pancreatic resection, lower extremity bypass, wound dehiscence, graft failure, surgical site infection, sepsis, emergency surgery, preoperative risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review