Cited by 181Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Relationship Between Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) and the Severity of Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Candemir, Mustafa, Kiziltunç, Emrullah, Nurkoç, Serdar, Şahinarslan, Asife·2021·Angiology

Abstract

Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII; platelet count × neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), a novel marker, predicts adverse clinical outcomes in coronary artery diseases (CAD). We hypothesized that SII could provide more valuable information in assessing the severity of CAD than ratios obtained from other white blood cell subtypes. Patients (n = 669) who underwent coronary angiography were analyzed in this retrospective study. We analyzed the relation between the SII and the angiographic severity of CAD. The severity of coronary atherosclerosis was determined by the SYNTAX score (SxS). Patients with CAD were divided into 3 groups according to the SxS. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to assess risk factors of CAD. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the SII (odds ratio: 1.004; 95% CI: 1.001-1.007; P = .015) was an independent predictor of high SxS. Additionally, there was a positive correlation between SII and SxS (Rho: 0.630, P ≤ .001). In the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, SII with an optimal cutoff value of 750 × 10 3 predicted the severe coronary lesion with a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 87.3%. The SII, an inexpensive and easily measurable laboratory variable, was significantly associated with the severity of CAD and high SxS in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003319720987743

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Candemir, M., Kiziltunç, E., Nurkoç, S., & Şahinarslan, A.
Affiliations
  • Gazi University (TR)
  • Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Yozgat City Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Yozgat, Turkey
Corresponding author
Candemir, Mustafa
Venue
Angiology
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
575-581
ISSN
  • 0003-3197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1574
OpenAlex
W3133744469
Cited by
181
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 3
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Angiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
systemic immune-inflammation index, stable coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis severity, SYNTAX score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet count, inflammatory markers, stable angina, coronary angiography
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Platelets, Coronary Artery Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Lymphocytes, Male, Middle Aged, Neutrophils, Platelet Count, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Coronary Angiography, Risk Assessment, Lymphocyte Count, Angina, Stable

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review