Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hospital vs Home-Based Exercise Rehabilitation for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Regensteiner, Judith G., Meyer, Thomas J., Krupski, William C., Cranford, Linda S., Hiatt, William R., Regensteiner, Judith G.·1997·Angiology

Abstract

Supervised, hospital-based exercise rehabilitation programs are effective for improving functional status for patients with claudication due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease. However, it has been suggested that unsupervised, home-based exercise programs, which have been relatively little evaluated, would be equally efficacious as compared with hospital-based programs. The authors tested the hypothesis that a hospital-based exercise rehabilitation program would improve treadmill exercise perfor mance more than a home-based program. Of 20 consecutively enrolled patients with claudication, 10 were randomly placed into a supervised, hospital-based program and 10 into an unsupervised, home-based program for a three-month period. Exercise perfor mance was evaluated by treadmill testing using a graded protocol. In addition, func tional status was evaluated by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) and the Medical Outcomes Study SF-20 questionnaire (MOS). Patients in the hospital-based program were treated with treadmill walking three times a week for one hour/visit. Patients in the home-based program were instructed to walk at least three times a week and were contacted weekly to provide encouragement and to record compliance with (continued on next page) the program. Patients in the hospital-based group improved peak walking time by 137%, pain-free walking time by 150%, and peak oxygen consumption by 19% (all P<0.05). Patients reported an improved walking distance and speed according to WIQ data (both P<0.05). In addition, the MOS physical functioning score in the hospital-based group improved by 20 percentage points (P<0.05). In contrast, patients in the home-based program did not improve exercise performance measured on the treadmill. Improvement in the ability to walk on the treadmill was greater in the hospital-based than the home- based program (P<0.05). The ability to walk distances was the only questionnaire measure that improved in persons who received the home-based program (P<0.05). Preliminary results suggest that a supervised, hospital-based program is more effective for improving treadmill exercise performance than an unsupervised, home-based program.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000331979704800402

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Regensteiner, J. G., Meyer, T. J., Krupski, W. C., Cranford, L. S., Hiatt, W. R., & Regensteiner, J. G.
Venue
Angiology
Published
1997-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
291-300
ISSN
  • 0003-3197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1574
OpenAlex
W2044316009
Cited by
229
References
0
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital vs Home-Based Exercise Rehabilitation for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000331979704800402
The paper
Regensteiner, J. G., Meyer, T. J., Krupski, W. C., Cranford, L. S., Hiatt, W. R., & Regensteiner, J. G. (1997). Hospital vs Home-Based Exercise Rehabilitation for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease. Angiology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000331979704800402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.