Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Temporal Bone Studies of the Human Peripheral Vestibular System: 1. Normative Vestibular Hair Cell Data

Merchant, Saumil N., Tsuji, Kojiro, Wall, Conrad, Velázquez-Villaseñor, Luis, Glynn, Robert J., Rauch, Steven D.·2000·Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology

Abstract

Quantitative studies of the vestibular system with serially sectioned human temporal bones have been limited because of difficulty in distinguishing hair cells from supporting cells and type I from type II hair cells. In addition, there is only a limited amount of normative data available regarding vestibular hair cell counts in humans. In this study, archival temporal bone sections were examined by Nomarski (differential interference contrast) microscopy, which permitted visualization of the cuticular plate and stereociliary bundle so as to allow unambiguous identification of hair cells. The density of type I, type II, and total numbers of vestibular hair cells in each of the 5 sense organs was determined in a set of 67 normal temporal bones that ranged from birth through 100 years of age. The mean total densities at birth were 76 to 79 cells per 0.01 mm 2 in the cristae, 68 cells per 0.01 mm 2 in the utricle, and 61 cells per 0.01 mm 2 in the saccule. The ratio of type I to type II hair cells at birth was 2.4:1 in the cristae and 1.3:1 in the maculae. There was a highly significant age-related decline in all sense organs for total, type I, and type II hair cell densities that was best fit by a linear regression model. The cristae lost type I cells with advancing age at a significantly greater rate than the maculae, whereas age-related losses for type II cells occurred at the same rate for all 5 sense organs. Hair cell densities in the cristae were significantly higher at the periphery than at the center. There were no significant sex or interaural differences for any of the counts. Mathematical models were developed to calculate the mean and 95% prediction intervals for the total, type I, and type II hair cell densities in each sense organ on the basis of age. There was overall good agreement between the hair cell densities determined in this study and those reported by others using surface preparation techniques. Our data and related models will serve as a normative database that will be useful for comparison to counts made from subjects with known vestibular disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00034894001090s502

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Merchant, S. N., Tsuji, K., Wall, C., Velázquez-Villaseñor, L., Glynn, R. J., & Rauch, S. D.
Venue
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Published
2000-05
Volume
109
Issue
5_suppl
Pages
3-13
ISSN
  • 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-572X
OpenAlex
W2571281431
Cited by
193
References
2
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Bone Studies of the Human Peripheral Vestibular System: 1. Normative Vestibular Hair Cell Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00034894001090s502
The paper
Merchant, S. N., Tsuji, K., Wall, C., Velázquez-Villaseñor, L., Glynn, R. J., & Rauch, S. D. (2000). Temporal Bone Studies of the Human Peripheral Vestibular System: 1. Normative Vestibular Hair Cell Data. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894001090s502

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.