Cited by 103Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaHearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

I Closure of the Cochlear Windows: Its Effect upon Air- and Bone-Conduction

Tonndorf, J., Tabor, James R.·1962·Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000348946207100101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tonndorf, J., & Tabor, J. R.
Affiliations
Iowa City, Ia.
Venue
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Published
1962-03
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
5-29
ISSN
  • 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-572X
OpenAlex
W2332719322
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
cochlear window, air conduction, bone conduction, hearing
MeSH terms
Bone Conduction, Cochlea, Hearing, Humans, Round Window, Ear

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review