Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,094

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Case Report and Literature Review

Spoden, James E., Bumsted, Robert M., Warner, Emory D.·1980·Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology

Abstract

A case of the chondroid variant of chordoma is presented. The differentiating features of this entity are discussed on a clinical and histopathologic basis. A review of the topic of chordoma is also provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000348948008900320

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,094

Metadata

Authors
Spoden, J. E., Bumsted, R. M., & Warner, E. D.
Venue
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Published
1980-05
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
279-285
ISSN
  • 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-572X
OpenAlex
W2329376561
Cited by
1,094
References
0
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case Report and Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000348948008900320
The paper
Spoden, J. E., Bumsted, R. M., & Warner, E. D. (1980). Case Report and Literature Review. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348948008900320

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.