The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy
Abstract
The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is a measure of patient benefit developed especially for otorhinolaryngological (ORL) interventions. Patient benefit is the change in health status resulting from health care intervention. The GBI was developed to be patient-oriented, to be maximally sensitive to ORL interventions, and to provide a common metric to compare benefit across different interventions. The GBI is an 18-item, postintervention questionnaire intended to be given to patients to fill in at home or in the outpatient clinic. In the first part of the paper, five different ORL interventions were retrospectively studied: middle ear surgery to improve hearing, provision of a cochlear implant, middle ear surgery to eradicate ear activity, rhinoplasty, and tonsillectomy. A criterion that was specific to the intervention was selected for each study, so that the patient outcome could be classified as above and below criterion. In all five interventions, the GBI was found to discriminate between above- and below-criterion outcomes. The second part of the paper reports on the results and implications of a factor analysis of patient responses. The factor structure was robust across the study, and so led to the construction of subscales. These subscales yield a profile score that provides information on the different types of patient benefit resulting from ORL interventions. The GBI is sensitive to the different ORL interventions, yet is sufficiently general to enable comparison between each pair of interventions. It provides a profile score, which enables further breakdown of results. As it provides a patient-oriented common metric, it is anticipated that the GBI will assist audit, research, and health policy planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001 · Cited by 4,619
Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
McDowell, I., & Newell, C. (1987) · Cited by 4,207
The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?
Garratt, A. M., Ruta, D. A., Abdalla, M. I., Buckingham, J. K., & Russell, I. T. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1440 · Cited by 1,141
Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales.
THORPE, K. (1992) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.1992.tb00744.x · Cited by 847
Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life
Anderson, R. T., Aaronson, N. K., & Wilkin, D. (1993) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf00422215 · Cited by 346
Measuring patients' views: the optimum outcome measure.
Ware, J. E. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1429 · Cited by 327
THE FIRST TEN YEARS OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
(1958) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1958.tb36542.x · Cited by 321
Recommended Procedures for Pure-tone Audiometry Using a Manually Operated Instrument
(1981) · British Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/03005368109081440 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper
Scadding, G., Hellings, P., Alobid, I., Bachert, C., Fokkens, W., van Wijk, R. G., Gevaert, P., Guilemany, J., Kalogjera, L., Lund, V., et al. (2011) · Clinical and Translational Allergy · doi:10.1186/2045-7022-1-2 · Cited by 220
MacKay, S., Carney, A. S., Catcheside, P. G., Chai-Coetzer, C. L., Chia, M., Cistulli, P. A., Hodge, J.-C., Jones, A., Kaambwa, B., Lewis, R., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.14265 · Cited by 151
Braun, T., Hainzinger, T., Stelter, K., Krause, E., Berghaus, A., & Hempel, J. M. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181f449c7 · Cited by 74
Braun, T., Gratza, S., Becker, S., Schwentner, I., Stelter, K., Patscheider, M., Berghaus, A., & Hempel, J. M. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ebe391 · Cited by 66
Otoplasty in adults: psychological impacts on quality of life.
Aliyeva, A., Yagız, O., & Ceylan, M. E. (2024) · Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1007/s12070-023-04296-x · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., & Browning, G. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 415-422
- ISSN
- 0003-4894 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-572X
- OpenAlex
- W2067158021
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000348949610500601
- The paper
- Robinson, K., Gatehouse, S., & Browning, G. G. (1996). Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.