Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age and sex variation in serum albumin concentration: an observational study.

Weaving, Gary, Batstone, Gifford F, Jones, Richard G·2016·Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Background: In the UK, a common reference interval for serum albumin is widely used irrespective of age or sex. Implicit in this is that laboratories produce analytically similar results. This paper challenges the validity of this approach. Methods: A three-week collection of results sent to all primary care centres in England has been analysed by age, sex and laboratory. In all, 1,079,193 serum albumin reports were included in this analysis. Results: The mean population serum albumin concentration increases to peak at around age 20 years and then decreases with increasing age. Values in females decrease more rapidly but become close to male values at 60 years. The variation between laboratories was large and potentially clinically significant. Conclusions: Reference intervals for serum albumin should be stratified by age and sex. Until there is greater methodological standardization, laboratories should determine their own reference intervals and not accept a single consensus reference interval.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004563215593561

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In people, albumin levels correlate with disease, nutrition, and socio-economic status rather than chronological age.

    “In people, albumin levels correlate with disease, nutrition, and socio-economic status rather than chronological age”

    From Rejuvenation of three germ layers tissues by exchanging old blood plasma with saline-albumin (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Aggregated data section reports that mean serum albumin concentration peaks around age 20 and then decreases with increasing age, contrary to the claim’s dismissal of chronological age. The Introduction says albumin is used to monitor disease and assess nutritional status, but our copy does not establish a correlation with socio-economic status. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In people, albumin diminishes only marginally, by 2-4% at 75 years of age from its 26 years of age levels.

    “albumin diminishes only marginally, by 2-4% at 75 years of age from its 26 years of age levels [21–24].”

    From Rejuvenation of three germ layers tissues by exchanging old blood plasma with saline-albumin (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Aggregated data section reports that serum albumin decreases with age. Table 1 (shown under Discussion; page not provided) gives medians of 43 to 42 g/L for females aged 26–30 versus 71–75, a decrease of about 2.3%, but 45 to 42 g/L for males, a decrease of about 6.7%. Thus the stated 2–4% range fits the female data, not people generally; the paper also reports age groups rather than values at exactly 26 and 75 years. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 10.1016/j.cca.2013.01.005 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/clinchem/32.2.339 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/clinchem/38.9.1853 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0009-8981(78)90254-1 · DOI
  5. 10.1515/CCLM.2000.093 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/000456329603300109 · DOI
  7. Miyake M, 2011, J Anal Bio-Sci, 34, 281
  8. R Core Team, 2003, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  9. 10.5858/arpa.2012-0152-CP · DOI
  10. 10.1373/clinchem.2011.164012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weaving, G., Batstone, G. F., & Jones, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemical Pathology and Immunology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
  • Yorkshire Centre for Health Informatics, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
Venue
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2015-06-12
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
106-111
ISSN
  • 0004-5632
  • 1758-1001
Cited by
229
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review