The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Free Beta Human Choriogonadotropin in Down's Syndrome Screening: A Multicentre Study of its Role Compared with other Biochemical Markers
Abstract
To ascertain the value of maternal serum free β-human choriogonadotropin subunit measurement in Down's syndrome screening and to compare its effectiveness when screening with a variety of biochemical markers, we have evaluated maternal serum free β-human choriogonadotropin, total human choriogonadotropin, α-fetoprotein and unconjugated oestriol in a large multicentre study of over 2800 unaffected cases and 90 affected cases, the largest collection of Down's cases ever reported. Of all the markers identified to date, free β-human choriogonadotropin is the marker of choice for use in Down's syndrome screening. When used in early gestation (14–16 weeks) in combination with α-fetoprotein and maternal age, it will allow the detection of 77% of Down's cases. A side-by-side comparison with the performance of total human choriogonadotropin shows the superior detection efficiency of free β-human choriogonadotropin. Unconjugated oestriol adds nothing further to the detection rate compared with the use of α-fetoprotein and free β-human choriogonadotropin alone, and its use results in a 1% increase in false positive rate. We conclude that unconjugated oestriol has no value in Down's screening. The superior detection rate obtained using free β-human choriogonadotropin is a result of superior detection of Down's cases in women under 30 years old, where the free β-human choriogonadotropin combination detects 100% more cases than does the total human choriogonadotropin combination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wald, N. J., Rodeck, C., Hackshaw, A. K., Walters, J., Chitty, L., & Mackinson, A. M. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7110 · Cited by 585
Antenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome
Wald, N. J., Kennard, A., Hackshaw, A., & McGuire, A. (1997) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1177/096914139700400402 · Cited by 406
Wald, N. J., Rodeck, C., Hackshaw, A. K., Walters, J., Chitty, L., & Mackinson, A. M. (2003) · Journal of Medical Screening · doi:10.1258/096914103321824133 · Cited by 331
Spencer, K., Liao, A. W., Ong, C. Y. T., Geerts, L., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2001) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.148 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Spencer, K., Coombes, E. J., Mallard, A. S., & Ward, A. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-518
- ISSN
- 0004-5632 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1001
- OpenAlex
- W2125586780
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Free Beta Human Choriogonadotropin in Down's Syndrome Screening: A Multicentre Study of its Role Compared with other Biochemical Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000456329202900504
- The paper
- Spencer, K., Coombes, E. J., Mallard, A. S., & Ward, A. M. (1992). Free Beta Human Choriogonadotropin in Down's Syndrome Screening: A Multicentre Study of its Role Compared with other Biochemical Markers. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329202900504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.