Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Free Beta Human Choriogonadotropin in Down's Syndrome Screening: A Multicentre Study of its Role Compared with other Biochemical Markers

Spencer, Kevin, Coombes, Ed J, Mallard, Angela S, Ward, A Milford·1992·Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

To ascertain the value of maternal serum free β-human choriogonadotropin subunit measurement in Down's syndrome screening and to compare its effectiveness when screening with a variety of biochemical markers, we have evaluated maternal serum free β-human choriogonadotropin, total human choriogonadotropin, α-fetoprotein and unconjugated oestriol in a large multicentre study of over 2800 unaffected cases and 90 affected cases, the largest collection of Down's cases ever reported. Of all the markers identified to date, free β-human choriogonadotropin is the marker of choice for use in Down's syndrome screening. When used in early gestation (14–16 weeks) in combination with α-fetoprotein and maternal age, it will allow the detection of 77% of Down's cases. A side-by-side comparison with the performance of total human choriogonadotropin shows the superior detection efficiency of free β-human choriogonadotropin. Unconjugated oestriol adds nothing further to the detection rate compared with the use of α-fetoprotein and free β-human choriogonadotropin alone, and its use results in a 1% increase in false positive rate. We conclude that unconjugated oestriol has no value in Down's screening. The superior detection rate obtained using free β-human choriogonadotropin is a result of superior detection of Down's cases in women under 30 years old, where the free β-human choriogonadotropin combination detects 100% more cases than does the total human choriogonadotropin combination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/000456329202900504

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Spencer, K., Coombes, E. J., Mallard, A. S., & Ward, A. M.
Venue
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
1992-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
506-518
ISSN
  • 0004-5632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1001
OpenAlex
W2125586780
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
33.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Free Beta Human Choriogonadotropin in Down's Syndrome Screening: A Multicentre Study of its Role Compared with other Biochemical Markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/000456329202900504
The paper
Spencer, K., Coombes, E. J., Mallard, A. S., & Ward, A. M. (1992). Free Beta Human Choriogonadotropin in Down's Syndrome Screening: A Multicentre Study of its Role Compared with other Biochemical Markers. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329202900504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.