CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 217Mental Health Treatment and AccessBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in the utilisation of psychotropic medications in Australia from 2000 to 2011

Stephenson, Chris P, Karanges, Emily, McGregor, Iain S·2013·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1177/0004867412466595
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: This study examined longitudinal trends in the dispensing of psychotropic medications in Australia from January 2000 to December 2011. Method: Dispensing data for the major classes of psychotropic medications (antidepressants, anxiolytics, sedatives, antipsychotics, mood stabilisers and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications) were obtained from the Drug Utilisation Sub-Committee of the Australian Department of Health and Ageing. Results were expressed in terms of defined daily doses/1000 population/day (DDDs/1000/day). Results: There was a 58.2% increase in the dispensing of psychotropic drugs in Australia from 2000 to 2011, driven by major increases in antidepressants (95.3% increase in DDDs/1000/day), atypical antipsychotics (217.7% increase) and ADHD medications (72.9% increase). Dispensing of anxiolytics remained largely unchanged, while sedatives and typical antipsychotics decreased by 26.4% and 61.2%, respectively. Lithium dispensing remained static while valproate and lamotrigine increased markedly. In 2011, antidepressants accounted for 66.9% of total psychotropic DDDs/1000/day totals, far greater than anxiolytics (11.4%), antipsychotics (7.3%), mood stabilisers (5.8%), sedatives (5.5%), or ADHD medications (3.0%). Sertraline, olanzapine, valproate and methylphenidate were the most frequently dispensed antidepressant, antipsychotic, mood stabiliser and ADHD medication, respectively, while diazepam and temazepam were the most commonly dispensed anxiolytic and sedative. Conclusions: Psychotropic utilisation markedly increased in Australia between 2000 and 2011. Some potential concerns include: (1) the continuing high use of benzodiazepines, particularly alprazolam, despite their problematic effects; (2) the rapid increase in serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use, given their more complex side-effect profile relative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); and (3) the dramatic increase in antidepressant prescriptions despite questions about the efficacy of these drugs in mild to moderate depression. Finally, some limitations are identified regarding use of the DDDs/1000/day metric, which can distort estimates of utilisation of specific drugs when the defined daily dose is higher or lower than the formulation most commonly dispensed by pharmacies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867412466595

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Britt H, 2011, General Practice Activity in Australia 2010–11: BEACH, Bettering the Evaluation And Care of Health
  2. Government of Western Australia, Department of Health, 2010, Raine ADHD Study: Long-term outcomes associated with stimulant medication in the treatment of ADHD in children
  3. 10.3109/00048670903489890 · DOI
  4. World Health Organization, 2011, Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment, 2012

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 217

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stephenson, C. P., Karanges, E., & McGregor, I. S.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-11-09
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
74-87
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
DOI
10.1177/0004867412466595
OpenAlex
W2067911406
Cited by
217
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 14
FWCI
31.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antidepressants, atypical antipsychotics, ADHD medication, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, defined daily doses, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, lithium, valproic acid, olanzapine, sertraline, diazepam, Australia, drug prescribing
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Antidepressive Agents, Australia, Drug Utilization, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Longitudinal Studies, Psychotropic Drugs, Antipsychotic Agents, Anti-Anxiety Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review