Cited by 167Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guideline for the management of deliberate self-harm

Open access
Carter, Gregory, Page, Andrew, Large, Matthew, Hetrick, Sarah, Milner, Allison Joy, Bendit, Nick, Walton, Carla, Draper, Brian +8 more·2016·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To provide guidance for the organisation and delivery of clinical services and the clinical management of patients who deliberately self-harm, based on scientific evidence supplemented by expert clinical consensus and expressed as recommendations. Method: Articles and information were sourced from search engines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO for several systematic reviews, which were supplemented by literature known to the deliberate self-harm working group, and from published systematic reviews and guidelines for deliberate self-harm. Information was reviewed by members of the deliberate self-harm working group, and findings were then formulated into consensus-based recommendations and clinical guidance. The guidelines were subjected to successive consultation and external review involving expert and clinical advisors, the public, key stakeholders, professional bodies and specialist groups with interest and expertise in deliberate self-harm. Results: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm provide up-to-date guidance and advice regarding the management of deliberate self-harm patients, which is informed by evidence and clinical experience. The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm is intended for clinical use and service development by psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians and others with an interest in mental health care. Conclusion: The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm address self-harm within specific population sub-groups and provide up-to-date recommendations and guidance within an evidence-based framework, supplemented by expert clinical consensus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867416661039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBT-A is a well-established and recommended treatment for reducing self-harming behavior and BPD according to several guidelines.

    “Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A) is the treatment that has shown the most encouraging results [12, 13], and is a well-established [14] and recommended treatment for reducing self-harming behavior and BPD according to several guidelines [15–17].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 357 · Cited by 167

Authors
Carter, G., Page, A., Large, M., Hetrick, S., Milner, A. J., Bendit, N., Walton, C., Draper, B., Hazell, P., Fortune, S., Burns, J., Patton, G., Lawrence, M., Dadd, L., Robinson, J., & Christensen, H.
Affiliations
  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Carter, Gregory
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
939-1000
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2522367337
Cited by
167
References
357
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
22.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
self-harm, self-harm management, mental health services, evidence-based recommendations
MeSH terms
Australia, Humans, New Zealand, Psychiatry, Societies, Medical, Self-Injurious Behavior, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review