Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guideline for the management of deliberate self-harm
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To provide guidance for the organisation and delivery of clinical services and the clinical management of patients who deliberately self-harm, based on scientific evidence supplemented by expert clinical consensus and expressed as recommendations. Method: Articles and information were sourced from search engines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO for several systematic reviews, which were supplemented by literature known to the deliberate self-harm working group, and from published systematic reviews and guidelines for deliberate self-harm. Information was reviewed by members of the deliberate self-harm working group, and findings were then formulated into consensus-based recommendations and clinical guidance. The guidelines were subjected to successive consultation and external review involving expert and clinical advisors, the public, key stakeholders, professional bodies and specialist groups with interest and expertise in deliberate self-harm. Results: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm provide up-to-date guidance and advice regarding the management of deliberate self-harm patients, which is informed by evidence and clinical experience. The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm is intended for clinical use and service development by psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians and others with an interest in mental health care. Conclusion: The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm address self-harm within specific population sub-groups and provide up-to-date recommendations and guidance within an evidence-based framework, supplemented by expert clinical consensus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DBT-A is a well-established and recommended treatment for reducing self-harming behavior and BPD according to several guidelines.
“Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (DBT-A) is the treatment that has shown the most encouraging results [12, 13], and is a well-established [14] and recommended treatment for reducing self-harming behavior and BPD according to several guidelines [15–17].”
From Evaluation of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents in routine clinical practice: a pre-post study (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 357 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Carter, G., Page, A., Large, M., Hetrick, S., Milner, A. J., Bendit, N., Walton, C., Draper, B., Hazell, P., Fortune, S., Burns, J., Patton, G., Lawrence, M., Dadd, L., Robinson, J., & Christensen, H.
- Affiliations
- Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Black Dog Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Carter, Gregory
- ORCID
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09-20
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 939-1000
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W2522367337
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 357
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 22.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-11-24)
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- self-harm, self-harm management, mental health services, evidence-based recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Humans, New Zealand, Psychiatry, Societies, Medical, Self-Injurious Behavior, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review