Development of a Scale to Measure Interpersonal Sensitivity
Abstract
We describe the development of a self-report measure (the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure or IPSM). The IPSM generates a total score as well as five sub-scale scores: interpersonal awareness, need for approval, separation anxiety, timidity and fragile inner-self. Its reliability is demonstrated by high internal consistency in two separate groups, and by stability in scores over time in a non-clinical group. Studies of a clinical group of depressives showed change in scale scores following improvement in the depressive state, suggesting some sensitivity of the measure to mood state. The IPSM appears related to measures of neuroticism and to low self-esteem but not to a modified concept of neuroticism, emotional arousability. The constructs contributing to interpersonal sensitivity and their relevance to depression are considered. Some preliminary findings of higher scores in depressives compared to non-depressives are reported.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Needs Threat Scale and Interpersonal Sensitivity Questionnaire include constructs broader than rejection sensitivity, such as shyness and meaningful existence.
“Whilst the Needs Threat Scale (Williams, 2009) and Interpersonal Sensitivity Questionnaire (Boyce & Parker, 1989) are thought to capture RS, both include constructs broader than RS, such as shyness (Boyce & Parker, 1989) and meaningful existence (Williams, 2009).”
From The link between rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2019) · cites this paper as Boyce & Parker, 1989
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 294
- Authors
- Boyce, P., & Parker, G.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-351
- ISSN
- 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
- 1440-1614
- OpenAlex
- W4231548807
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- interpersonal sensitivity, self-report scale development, interpersonal awareness, need for approval, separation anxiety, timidity, depression, neuroticism, self-esteem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review