Imagining Instructions: Mental Practice in Highly Cognitive Domains
Abstract
This article reviews recent empirical investigations of imagination or mental practice in highly cognitive, realistic educational domains such as mathematics or learning computer applications. While mental practice has been a standard tool in training schedules devised by sports psychologists for several decades, with its efficacy studied experimentally in a multitude of sports, there has been little corresponding research in the education or training research literature. Recent research has demonstrated that mental practice can be incorporated effectively when learning non-motor, complex cognitive skills. Experimental studies are reviewed showing ‘imagining’ worked examples, paired with practice questions, enhances learning for more experienced learners, but study activities are more appropriate for students less experienced in a given domain. Interactions of the imagination effect with cognitive load effects are also discussed. Possible directions for mental practice research in education are proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The extent to which improvement occurs depends on the extent to which the motor task has cognitive components.
“Furthermore, the extent to which improvement occurs depends on the extent to which the motor task has cognitive components (Ginns 2005b).”
From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Ginns 2005b
Novice learners are not yet able to imagine in a vivid way the processes required for successful task performance.
“Novice learners, however, will not yet be able to imagine the processes that are required for successful task performance in a vivid way (Ginns 2005b).”
From Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later (2019) · cites this paper as Ginns 2005b
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Ginns, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ginns, Paul
- ORCID
- Ginns, Paul
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-140
- ISSN
- 0004-9441 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-5884
- OpenAlex
- W2051159275
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- mental practice, imagination, mathematics learning, worked examples, cognitive load, training schedule, sport psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review