An examination of touch screen tablets and emergent literacy in Australian pre-school children
Abstract
Young children interact with touch screen tablets at home and this may impact upon emergent literacy. The present study examined home access and use of touch screen tablets, as reported by parents, in Australian pre-schoolers ( N = 109) aged 3–5 years and whether this was associated with emergent literacy skills (letter name and sound, numeral identification, print concepts and name writing). Children with greater access to tablets were found to have higher letter sound and name writing skills. No relationships were found between time on tablets and emergent literacy skills. The quality of experiences rather than time spent on tablets may be important especially when viewed within a socio-cultural framework. Most parents (69%) reported that tablets were easy for their child to operate and believed tablets support early literacy development (70%). 53% believed children should have access to tablets at pre-school. Tablets have the potential to foster emergent literacy although this may depend upon the quality of digital interactions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several factors may shape the positive cognitive effects of screen media, including the child's age, the quality and type of interactive media, and guidance from parents or teachers.
“Emerging data suggest that these positive cognitive benefits may be influenced by several factors, including the age of the child (Anderson, Subrahmanyam, & Cognitive Impacts of Digital Media Workgroup, 2017), quality and kind of interactive media, and type of guidance provided by parents and/or teachers (M. Neumann & D. Neumann, 2014).”
From Screen Media Overuse and Associated Physical, Cognitive, and Emotional/Behavioral Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: An Integrative Review (2022) · cites this paper as M. Neumann & D. Neumann, 2014
Cites
THE ROLE OF TUTORING IN PROBLEM SOLVING <sup>*</sup>
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x · Cited by 8,851 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children
Neumann, M. M. (2018) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.006 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationLiu, J., Riesch, S., Tien, J., Lipman, T., Pinto-Martin, J., & O'Sullivan, A. (2022) · Journal of Pediatric Health Care · doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2021.06.003 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Mallawaarachchi, S. R., Anglim, J., Hooley, M., & Horwood, S. (2022) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.12.008 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
- Authors
- Neumann, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Neumann, Michelle M
- ORCID
- Neumann, Michelle M
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-02-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-122
- ISSN
- 0004-9441 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-5884
- OpenAlex
- W2027729831
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 52.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
- Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- touch screen tablets, emergent literacy, preschool children, name writing, print concepts, parental attitudes, early literacy development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review