The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“A Necessary Supplement”: What the United Nations Global Compact Is and Is Not
Abstract
The United Nations Global Compact is with currently more than 6,000 voluntary participants the world’s largest corporate citizenship initiative. This article first analyzes three critical allegations often made against the Compact by looking at the academic and nonacademic literature. (1) The Compact supports the capture of the United Nations by “big business.” (2) Its 10 principles are vague and thus hard to implement. (3) The Compact is not accountable due to an absence of verification mechanisms. This article discusses these three allegations and argues that they rest on a misunderstanding of (a) the nature of the Compact as well as its mandate and (b) the goals it tries to achieve. From this discussion of what the Compact is not, the article then outlines a perspective that classifies the initiative as a necessary supplement to incomplete state and nonstate regulatory approaches in order to illustrate what the Compact is.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA 8000
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.5840/beq200717230 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Cited by
The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612450120 · Cited by 392
Self-citationReflections on the 2018 Decade Award: The Meaning and Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0348 · Cited by 292
Perez-Batres, L. A., Miller, V. V., & Pisani, M. J. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.003 · Cited by 131
Sustainable Financial Products in the Latin America Banking Industry: Current Status and Insights
Mejia-Escobar, J. C., González-Ruiz, J. D., & Duque-Grisales, E. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145648 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Rasche, A.
- Venue
- Business & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03-27
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 511-537
- ISSN
- 0007-6503 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4205
- OpenAlex
- W1970207109
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “A Necessary Supplement”: What the United Nations Global Compact Is and Is Not. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0007650309332378
- The paper
- Rasche, A. (2009). “A Necessary Supplement”: What the United Nations Global Compact Is and Is Not. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309332378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.