Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution

Golinko, Michael S., Arslanian, Brian, Williams, Joseph K.·2017·Clinical Pediatrics

Abstract

Dog bite injuries remain a common form of pediatric trauma. This single-institution study of 1616 consecutive dog bite injuries over 4 years revealed a much higher prevalence of dog bites as compared with other similar centers. Though inpatient admission was rare (9.8%), 58% of all patients required laceration repair, primarily in the emergency department. Infants were more than 4 times as likely to be bitten by the family dog and more than 6 times as likely to be bitten in the head/neck region. Children ≤5 years old were 62% more likely to require repair; and 5.5% of all patients required an operation. Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds. The relatively high regional prevalence and younger age of injured patients as compared with other centers is a topic of further study but should draw attention to interventions that can minimize child risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0009922816657153

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68935-6 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/ip.2007.016220 · DOI
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 52, 605
  4. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.024 · DOI
  5. 10.1580/08-WEME-OR-213.1 · DOI
  6. Dwyer JP, 2007, S Afr Med J, 97, 597
  7. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181937925 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addad9 · DOI
  9. 10.1055/s-0033-1349211 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211cd68 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2000.tb00090.x · DOI
  12. 10.1136/ip.2010.029868 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31822c1112 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jama.279.1.51 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S1481803500014494 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.002 · DOI
  17. 10.1542/peds.2005-1451 · DOI
  18. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138810.x · DOI
  19. 10.1590/S1726-46342011000400011 · DOI
  20. Ichhpujani RL, 2008, J Commun Dis, 40, 27
  21. 10.1097/01.pec.0000280509.67795.a9 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001391 · DOI
  23. 10.1136/ip.2010.028548 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm014 · DOI
  25. 10.2460/javma.243.12.1726 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/000313489906500911 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00070.x · DOI
  28. 10.1001/archpedi.152.10.1035 · DOI
  29. Duperrex O, 2009, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD004726
  30. 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040389 · DOI
  31. 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1732 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 47

Metadata

Authors
Golinko, M. S., Arslanian, B., & Williams, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Arkansas Children’s Hospital Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Little Rock, AR, USA
  • Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA) at Scottish Rite, Atlanta, GA, USA
Venue
Clinical Pediatrics
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
316-325
ISSN
  • 0009-9228
  • 1938-2707
Cited by
47
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review