The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution
Abstract
Dog bite injuries remain a common form of pediatric trauma. This single-institution study of 1616 consecutive dog bite injuries over 4 years revealed a much higher prevalence of dog bites as compared with other similar centers. Though inpatient admission was rare (9.8%), 58% of all patients required laceration repair, primarily in the emergency department. Infants were more than 4 times as likely to be bitten by the family dog and more than 6 times as likely to be bitten in the head/neck region. Children ≤5 years old were 62% more likely to require repair; and 5.5% of all patients required an operation. Pit bull bites were implicated in half of all surgeries performed and over 2.5 times as likely to bite in multiple anatomic locations as compared to other breeds. The relatively high regional prevalence and younger age of injured patients as compared with other centers is a topic of further study but should draw attention to interventions that can minimize child risk.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several authors [14, 21, 32, 33] have noted that children are more likely to sustain bites to the head and neck, while adults are more likely to sustain bites to the extremities.”
From The demographics of dog bites in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68935-6 · DOI
- 10.1136/ip.2007.016220 · DOI
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 52, 605
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.024 · DOI
- 10.1580/08-WEME-OR-213.1 · DOI
- Dwyer JP, 2007, S Afr Med J, 97, 597
- 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181937925 · DOI
- 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addad9 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-0033-1349211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211cd68 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2000.tb00090.x · DOI
- 10.1136/ip.2010.029868 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31822c1112 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.279.1.51 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1481803500014494 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.002 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2005-1451 · DOI
- 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138810.x · DOI
- 10.1590/S1726-46342011000400011 · DOI
- Ichhpujani RL, 2008, J Commun Dis, 40, 27
- 10.1097/01.pec.0000280509.67795.a9 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001391 · DOI
- 10.1136/ip.2010.028548 · DOI
- 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm014 · DOI
- 10.2460/javma.243.12.1726 · DOI
- 10.1177/000313489906500911 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00070.x · DOI
- 10.1001/archpedi.152.10.1035 · DOI
- Duperrex O, 2009, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD004726
- 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040389 · DOI
- 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1732 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The demographics of dog bites in the United States
Loder, R. T. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01360 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Golinko, M. S., Arslanian, B., & Williams, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Arkansas Children’s Hospital Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Little Rock, AR, USA
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA) at Scottish Rite, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Venue
- Clinical Pediatrics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-20
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 316-325
- ISSN
- 0009-9228
- 1938-2707
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review