Contending With Stereotype Threat at Work: A Model of Long-Term Responses 1Ψ7
Abstract
Women and people of color are still underrepresented in many occupational roles. Being in a situation where one is underrepresented, and thus in the demographic minority, has been shown to be a factor leading to the experience of stereotype threat—the expectation that one will be judged or perceived on the basis of social identity group membership rather than actual performance and potential. Although numerous laboratory studies have documented the negative impact of stereotype threat on short-term task performance, its effects in applied contexts, such as work settings, remain unexplored. Utilizing theories from the social, organizational, and counseling psychology literatures, the authors propose a conceptual model of long-term responses to stereotype threat in the workplace. The authors posit a framework of possible responses to stereotype threat that include fending off the stereotype, discouraged by the stereotype, and resilient to the stereotype. Within each response set, there are numerous strategies that an individual can employ, with varying benefits and consequences. The authors conclude the article by suggesting an agenda for future research and discussing the implications of the model for understanding stereotype threat in the workplace.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stereotype-based expectations of inferiority can be threatening to women and can contribute to the shortage of female leaders across diverse occupations.
“These stereotype-based expectations of inferiority can be threatening to women and can contribute to the shortage of female leaders across diverse occupations (Block, Koch, Liberman, Merriweather, & Roberson, 2011) from the law (Vault/MCCA, 2013) to academic medicine (Burgess, Joseph, van Ryn, & Carnes, 2012).”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Block, Koch, Liberman, Merriweather, & Roberson, 2011
Programs for reducing stereotype threat typically focus on modifying the context and/or lessening individual reactions.
“Programs for reducing stereotype threat typically focus on modifying the context and/or lessening individual reactions (Block et al., 2011;Burgess et al., 2012;Kray & Shirako, 2011;Roberson & Kulik, 2007).”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Block et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 99 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Block, C. J., Koch, S. M., Liberman, B. E., Merriweather, T. J., & Roberson, L.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA,
- Corresponding author
- Block, Caryn J.
- Koch, Sandy M.
- Merriweather, Tarani J.
- Roberson, Loriann
- Venue
- The Counseling Psychologist
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 570-600
- ISSN
- 0011-0000 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3861
- OpenAlex
- W2132550945
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Counseling Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Earth Institute, Columbia University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, workplace, long-term response, underrepresented groups, women, people of color, coping strategies, resilience, discouragement, social identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review