The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental Inequalities: Literature Review and Proposals for New Directions in Research and Theory
Abstract
The first battles that led to the formation of the Environmental Justice movement also produced the first studies of race and exposure to toxins. Subsequently, demographers, geographers, sociologists, political scientists, historians and legal scholars have all contributed to an ever-expanding body of studies. We review the most important works that have been published in the 1990s, focusing especially on studies of waste sites, studies of toxic industrial emissions and, finally, on local histories that have begun to show in detail how environmental inequalities develop over time. We explore the ways that the close association between movement and research produced both gains and losses for that research. The political power and moral force of the movement gave the research effort great impetus, but it also defined the research agenda in ways that steered inquiry away from certain potentially important topics or themes. We end the paper with brief discussions of two of these neglected topics: first, investigating where economic elites and their exclusive residential communities are situated geographically in relation to toxic hazards; second, setting environmental inequality in global and historical contexts and theorizing it as one facet or moment of the larger social inequalities that have characterized modern society from its inception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mohai, P., Pellow, D., & Roberts, J. T. (2009) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348 · Cited by 1,448
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities
Brulle, R. J., & Pellow, D. N. (2006) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102124 · Cited by 1,117
Socioeconomic Disparities and Air Pollution Exposure: a Global Review
Hajat, A., Hsia, C., & O’Neill, M. S. (2015) · Current Environmental Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s40572-015-0069-5 · Cited by 1,097
Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., Porras, C., & Sadd, J. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s2149 · Cited by 317
Adamkiewicz, G., Zota, A. R., Fabian, M. P., Chahine, T., Julien, R., Spengler, J. D., & Levy, J. I. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300119 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Szasz, A., & Meuser, M.
- Venue
- Current Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 99-120
- ISSN
- 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7064
- OpenAlex
- W1980420211
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Inequalities: Literature Review and Proposals for New Directions in Research and Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001139297045003006
- The paper
- Szasz, A., & Meuser, M. (1997). Environmental Inequalities: Literature Review and Proposals for New Directions in Research and Theory. Current Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139297045003006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.