Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Sustainability of Innovative Schools as Learning Organizations and Professional Learning Communities During Standardized Reform

Giles, Corrie, Hargreaves, Andy·2006·Educational Administration Quarterly

Abstract

Background: Implicitly, innovative schools have historically contained some (but not usually all) of the properties of learning organizations and professional learning communities but have a weak record of sustaining success over time. Can innovative schools that self-consciously establish themselves as learning organizations and professional learning communities sustain their early promise of success in the face of the predictable cycle of the “attrition of change”; of pressure and envy in the surrounding district, profession, and community; and of the historically specific and recent pressure of standardized reform? Purpose : This article explores the impact of these influences on three innovative schools and their sustainability over time. It concentrates in particular on the promise and viability of one of these schools, which has been consciously modeled as a learning organization and professional learning community. Conclusions: Although further research is required, the article concludes that the learning organization and professional learning community model may provide a more robust resistance to conventional processes of the attrition of change and of surrounding change forces, but much like other innovative schools, it also shows signs of defaulting to conventional patterns of schooling in the face of standardized reform.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013161x05278189

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLCs have been successful within many studies demonstrating teachers being open to modifying their teaching strategies, leading to increased student learning, decreased student dropout and absenteeism rates, and smaller achievement gaps among students.

    “PLCs have been successful within many studies demonstrating teachers being open to modifying their teaching strategies (Giles & Hargreaves, 2006;Gregory & Kuzmich, 2007;Hord, 1997;Rasberry & Mahajan, 2008), leading to increased student learning (Gregory & Kuzmich, 2007;Rasberry & Mahajan, 2008), decreased student dropout and absenteeism rates (Gregory & Kuzmich, 2007;Rasberry & Mahajan, 2008), and”
  • It is critical for trust to be developed within groups to admit what they do not know, and professionals are given freedom to try out new approaches and innovate without being penalized.

    “It is critical for trust to be developed within groups to admit what they do not know, and professionals are given the freedom to try out new approaches and innovate without being penalized (Giles & Hargreaves, 2006).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Armstrong, D. G., 1997, Teaching today: An introduction to education
  2. 10.1080/0022027920240201 · DOI
  3. 10.1057/9780333985380 · DOI
  4. Cochran-Smith, M., 1999, Review of Research in Education, 24, 24
  5. Crowther, F., 2002, Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success
  6. Deming, W. E., 1986, Out of the crisis
  7. Department for Education and Skills, 2001, Achieving success
  8. Dormeus, R. R., 1981, Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 199
  9. Fenwick, T., 2000, Knowledge, power and learning, 74
  10. 10.1108/09696479710170842 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF03219692 · DOI
  12. Fink, D., 2000, Good schools/real schools: Why school reform doesn’t last
  13. Fletcher, C., 1985, Schools on trial
  14. Fullan, M., 1993, Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform
  15. 10.1023/A:1016596004904 · DOI
  16. Glaser, B., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory
  17. Gold, B. A., 1981, Whose school is it anyway: Parent-teacher conflict over an innovative school
  18. Hargreaves, A., 1994, Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the post-modern age
  19. 10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00025-0 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/BF03219694 · DOI
  21. Hargreaves, A., 2003, Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity
  22. Hargreaves, A., 2000, Educational Leadership, 57, 30
  23. Hargreaves, A., 2000, Change frames: Supporting secondary teachers in interpreting and integrating secondary school reform
  24. Hord, S. M., 1987, Evaluating educational innovation
  25. Leithwood, K., 1998, Organizational learning in schools
  26. Lipton, L., 1997, The process-centered school: Sustaining a renaissance community
  27. Louis, K. S., 1995, Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools
  28. Macmillan, R., 2000, The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform
  29. McLaughlin, M., 2001, Professional communities and the work of high school teaching
  30. McNeil, L. M., 2000, Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing
  31. Merriam, S. B., 1988, Case study research in education: A qualitative approach
  32. Metz, M. H., 1991, Educational politics for the new century, 75
  33. Miles, M. B., 1984, Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods
  34. Mitchell, C., 2000, Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community
  35. 10.1007/978-94-011-4944-0_31 · DOI
  36. Newmann, F., American Educational Research Association annual conference
  37. Newmann, F., 1995, Successful school restructuring
  38. Oakes, J., 2000, Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform
  39. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2001, Schooling for tomorrow: What schools for the future?
  40. 10.1177/0263211X000283005 · DOI
  41. 10.1108/09696479710170833 · DOI
  42. Sarason, S., 1972, The creation of settings and the future societies
  43. 10.1177/0013161X99351007 · DOI
  44. Senge, P. M., 1990, The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization
  45. Senge, P. M., 2000, Schools that learn
  46. Sennett, R., 1998, The corrosion of character
  47. Sergiovanni, T. J., 1994, Building community in schools
  48. Smith, L. M., 1987, The fate of an innovative school
  49. 10.1177/0263211X000283004 · DOI
  50. Talbert, J., 1995, The subjects in question: Department organization in the high school, 68
  51. 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Whitty, G., 1998, Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A.
Venue
Educational Administration Quarterly
Published
2006-02
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
124-156
ISSN
  • 0013-161X
  • 1552-3519
Cited by
269
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review