The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Justice Educational Leaders and Resistance: Toward a Theory of Social Justice Leadership
Abstract
Purpose : A subgroup of principals—leaders for social justice—guide their schools to transform the culture, curriculum, pedagogical practices, atmosphere, and schoolwide priorities to benefit marginalized students. The purpose of the article is to develop a theory of this social justice educational leadership. Research Design : This empirical study examined the following questions: (a) In what ways are principals enacting social justice in public schools? (b) What resistance do social justice—driven principals face in their justice work? (c) What strategies do principals develop to sustain their ability to enact social justice in light of the resistance they face in public schools? Data Collection and Analysis : A critical, qualitative, positioned-subject approach combined with principles of autoethnography guided the research methods. Seven public school leaders who came to the principalship with a social justice orientation, who make issues of race, class, gender, disability, sexual orientation, and other historically marginalizing factors central to their advocacy, leadership practice, and vision, and who have demonstrated success in making their schools more just, were studied through interviews. Findings: A description of (a) how the principals enacted social justice, (b) the resistance they faced as well as the toll the resistance had on them, and (c) the strategies they developed to sustain their social justice work is provided in detail. Implications for administrator preparation are made at the close of this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Maxwell, J. (2009) · The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483348858.n7 · Cited by 1,734
Cited by
Culturally Responsive School Leadership: A Synthesis of the Literature
Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316630383 · Cited by 1,262
Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership
Hallinger, P. (2018) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/1741143216670652 · Cited by 755
Social Justice Leadership as Praxis: Developing Capacities Through Preparation Programs
Furman, G. (2012) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x11427394 · Cited by 591
Beyond individual effectiveness: Conceptualizing organizational leadership for equity
Ishimaru, A. M., & Galloway, M. K. (2014) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.890733 · Cited by 126
Promoting social justice in schools: Principals’ political strategies
Ryan, J. (2010) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2010.503281 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Theoharis, G.
- Venue
- Educational Administration Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-258
- ISSN
- 0013-161X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3519
- OpenAlex
- W1986389861
- Cited by
- 1,352
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 95.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.