Cited by 528Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistics Education and Methodologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals that are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions

Cumming, Geoff, Finch, Sue·2001·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

Reform of statistical practice in the social and behavioral sciences requires wider use of confidence intervals (CIs), effect size measures, and meta-analysis. The authors discuss four reasons for promoting use of CIs: They (a) are readily interpretable, (b) are linked to familiar statistical significance tests, (c) can encourage meta-analytic thinking, and (d) give information about precision. The authors discuss calculation of CIs for a basic standardized effect size measure, Cohen’s δ (also known as Cohen’s d), and contrast these with the familiar CIs for original score means. CIs for δ require use of noncentral t distributions, which the authors apply also to statistical power and simple meta-analysis of standardized effect sizes. They provide the ESCI graphical software, which runs under Microsoft Excel, to illustrate the discussion. Wider use of CIs for δ and other effect size measures should help promote highly desirable reform of statistical practice in the social sciences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164401614002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 528

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Altman, D., 2000, Statistics with confidence, 120
  2. American Psychological Association, 1994, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association
  3. 10.1037/h0020412 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/096228029300200204 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/h0041052 · DOI
  6. Cohen, J., 1969, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  7. Cohen, J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  8. Cook, T., 1992, Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook
  9. Cowles, M., 1989, Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective
  10. Fidler, F., 2001, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 575
  11. Finch, S., 2001, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 181
  12. Gigerenzer, G., 1987, Cognition as intuitive statistics
  13. Glass, G., 1981, Meta-analysis in social research
  14. 10.1037/h0038813 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114945 · DOI
  16. Hays, W., 1988, Statistics
  17. 10.1093/biomet/48.3-4.465 · DOI
  18. Howell, D., 1997, Statistical methods for psychology
  19. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00534.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/0013164401612005 · DOI
  21. Kendall, M., 1961, The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 2)
  22. 10.1177/00131640121971185 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1037/h0025179 · DOI
  24. Light, R., 1994, The handbook of research synthesis, 439
  25. Lockhart, R., 1998, Introduction to statistics and data analysis for the behavioral sciences
  26. 10.3758/BF03204506 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806 · DOI
  28. Moore, D., 1993, Introduction to the practice of statistics
  29. 10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Owen, D., 1968, Technometrics, 10, 445
  31. Pearson, E., 1972, Biometrika tables for statisticians (Vol. 2)
  32. Rubin, D., 1990, The future of metaanalysis, 155
  33. 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.115 · DOI
  34. Schmidt, F., 1997, What if there were no significance tests?, 37
  35. Smithson, M., 2000, Statistics with confidence, 10.4135/9781446218525 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/00131640121971392 · DOI
  37. Steiger, J., 1997, What if there were no significance tests?, 221
  38. Thomason, N., 1994, Interactive multimedia in university education: Designing for change in teaching & learning, 59
  39. 10.1037/0003-066X.53.7.799 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cumming, G., & Finch, S.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2001-08
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
532-574
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2011550426
Cited by
528
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
FWCI
28.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
Keywords
confidence intervals, noncentral t distribution, Cohen's d, standardized effect size, statistical power, meta-analysis, statistical reform, estimation precision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals that are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013164401614002
The paper
Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2001). A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals that are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401614002