The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals that are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions
Abstract
Reform of statistical practice in the social and behavioral sciences requires wider use of confidence intervals (CIs), effect size measures, and meta-analysis. The authors discuss four reasons for promoting use of CIs: They (a) are readily interpretable, (b) are linked to familiar statistical significance tests, (c) can encourage meta-analytic thinking, and (d) give information about precision. The authors discuss calculation of CIs for a basic standardized effect size measure, Cohen’s δ (also known as Cohen’s d), and contrast these with the familiar CIs for original score means. CIs for δ require use of noncentral t distributions, which the authors apply also to statistical power and simple meta-analysis of standardized effect sizes. They provide the ESCI graphical software, which runs under Microsoft Excel, to illustrate the discussion. Wider use of CIs for δ and other effect size measures should help promote highly desirable reform of statistical practice in the social sciences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Formally, hypothesis testing and estimation are distinct approaches (Cumming & Finch, 2001).”
From Equivalence Tests (2017) · cites this paper as Cumming & Finch, 2001
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 69 · Cited by 528
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Altman, D., 2000, Statistics with confidence, 120
- American Psychological Association, 1994, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association
- 10.1037/h0020412 · DOI
- 10.1177/096228029300200204 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0041052 · DOI
- Cohen, J., 1969, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- Cohen, J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- Cook, T., 1992, Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook
- Cowles, M., 1989, Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective
- Fidler, F., 2001, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 575
- Finch, S., 2001, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 181
- Gigerenzer, G., 1987, Cognition as intuitive statistics
- Glass, G., 1981, Meta-analysis in social research
- 10.1037/h0038813 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114945 · DOI
- Hays, W., 1988, Statistics
- 10.1093/biomet/48.3-4.465 · DOI
- Howell, D., 1997, Statistical methods for psychology
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00534.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0013164401612005 · DOI
- Kendall, M., 1961, The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 2)
- 10.1177/00131640121971185 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0025179 · DOI
- Light, R., 1994, The handbook of research synthesis, 439
- Lockhart, R., 1998, Introduction to statistics and data analysis for the behavioral sciences
- 10.3758/BF03204506 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806 · DOI
- Moore, D., 1993, Introduction to the practice of statistics
- 10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241 · DOI · Paper page
- Owen, D., 1968, Technometrics, 10, 445
- Pearson, E., 1972, Biometrika tables for statisticians (Vol. 2)
- Rubin, D., 1990, The future of metaanalysis, 155
- 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.115 · DOI
- Schmidt, F., 1997, What if there were no significance tests?, 37
- Smithson, M., 2000, Statistics with confidence, 10.4135/9781446218525 · DOI
- 10.1177/00131640121971392 · DOI
- Steiger, J., 1997, What if there were no significance tests?, 221
- Thomason, N., 1994, Interactive multimedia in university education: Designing for change in teaching & learning, 59
- 10.1037/0003-066X.53.7.799 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Cumming, G., & Finch, S.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 532-574
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2011550426
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 28.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Keywords
- confidence intervals, noncentral t distribution, Cohen's d, standardized effect size, statistical power, meta-analysis, statistical reform, estimation precision
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals that are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013164401614002
- The paper
- Cumming, G., & Finch, S. (2001). A Primer on the Understanding, Use, and Calculation of Confidence Intervals that are Based on Central and Noncentral Distributions. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164401614002