The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research
Abstract
ALTHOUGH PEER RATINGS WERE NOT REGARDED AS vA!!r INDICATORS IN TrcT ,TV^!ES. rKUJECT DEMONSTRATES THAT PEER RATINGS OF PERSONALITY CAN BF HELPFUL IN CLARIFYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND ACADINIC SUCCESS. TEST CONDITIONS WERE DESIGNED TO AVOID METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. PERSONALITY VARIABLES WERE CAREFULLY ANALYZED, AND A FORCED-CHOICE PROCEDURE WAS ADOPTED. TEST SUBJECTS WERE CAPABLE OF EFFECTIVELY RATING ONE ANOTHER BECAUSE THEY INTERACTED FREQUENTLY. PEER RATINGS WERE COLLECTED BEFORE THE FIRST MIDTERM EXAMINATIONS IN ORDER TO PREVENT AN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE BIAS. THE RESULTS OF RELIABILITY AND FACTOR ANALYTIC STUDIES PERFORMED ON PEER-RATING DATA DEMONSTRATED A POSTIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS. THE STUDY SHOWS THAT PERSEVERANCE,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093360 · Cited by 2,018
Cited by
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.1.26 · Cited by 4,816
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682
Further specification of the five robust factors of personality.
Digman, J. M., & Inouye, J. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.116 · Cited by 579
Eggers, J. H. (2000) · The Journal of Private Equity · doi:10.3905/jpe.2000.319978 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, G. M.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1967-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 967-984
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W1928369584
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001316446702700445
- The paper
- Smith, G. M. (1967). Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446702700445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
