The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior: An Examination of the New Ecological Paradigm in a Social Psychological Context
Abstract
We use national-level data to test a modified version of Stern, Dietz, & Guagnano’s causal model of environmental belief and behavior. We focus mainly on ethnic variation in environmental belief, as measured by the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP), and ethnic variation for four environmental behaviors: environmental reading, household recycling, environmental group joining, and participation in nature-based outdoor recreation. Blacks and foreign-born Latinos were less likely than Whites to score higher on the NEP. Any behavioral differences between Whites and the respective minority groups were expected to diminish with the inclusion of the NEP as an intervening variable in the model between ethnicity and behavior. However, ethnic differences remained stable and strong even when environmental belief was added. Overall, Asian American and U.S.-born Latino environmentalism was most similar to Whites. African American concern and behavior was least similar to White environmentalism. Gender, age, and liberal political orientation were also consistent explicators for both environmental concern and behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
Cited by
Green Consumption: Behavior and Norms
Peattie, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328 · Cited by 964
Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing behavior
Lee, K. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760910940456 · Cited by 666
A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer
Mostafa, M. M. (2007) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20168 · Cited by 567
Saphores, J.-D. M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2012) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.003 · Cited by 392
Environmental Attitudes, Knowledge, Intentions and Behaviors Among College Students
Levine, D. S., & Strube, M. J. (2012) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2011.604363 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M., & Cordell, H. K.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-186
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2167743165
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 54.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior: An Examination of the New Ecological Paradigm in a Social Psychological Context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916503251478
- The paper
- Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M., & Cordell, H. K. (2004). Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior: An Examination of the New Ecological Paradigm in a Social Psychological Context. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251478
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.