The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Purposive Evaluation of Places: A Facet Approach
Abstract
A multivariate, purposive model of the experience of places is offered as a theoretical basis for place evaluation. This model suggests a structure to the evaluation of places that may be generalizable across most settings. The structure derives from the definition of place evaluation as the degree to which a person sees a place as helping to achieve that person's goals at various levels of interaction with that place. In order to test empirically this framework, use is made of the facet approach to theory specification and hypothesis testing. Smallest Space analyses of two large scale questionnaire surveys, one of housing satisfaction and the other of hospital ward design, provide strong support for the purposive model. Implications of this multivariate model for future evaluations are discussed, together with the value of harnessing the facet approach to aid the development of evaluation theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Guttman, L. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02290164 · Cited by 1,343
Cited by
Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.2.120.18470 · Cited by 2,257
(1998) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1,934
Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2003) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00236-0 · Cited by 428
A comprehensive model of customer trust in two retail stores
Guenzi, P., Johnson, M. D., & Castaldo, S. (2009) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/09564230910964408 · Cited by 191
Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., Alves, S., Ferreira, I., Mao, Y., Moffat, E., Piccinin, G., & Rahimi, L. (2015) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-015-0691-z · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Canter, D.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 659-698
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2075823976
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Purposive Evaluation of Places: A Facet Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916583156001
- The paper
- Canter, D. (1983). The Purposive Evaluation of Places: A Facet Approach. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583156001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.