The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Cohesiveness, Territoriality, and Holiday Decorations: The Influence of Cul-de-Sacs
Abstract
Altman's territoriality theory was used as a framework for examining neighborhood attachment. We hypothesized that attachment would be manifested in interrelated patterns of neighboring behaviors, attitudes indicating that the block was a secondary territory, and individual and communal displays of holiday decorations. Design features of cul-de-sacs were hypothesized to contribute to greater degrees of block attachment on cul-de-sacs than on through streets. Attachment was assessed through interviews with female residents and observations of holiday decorations on the target home and its block at Halloween and Christmas. Analyses indicated that attitudes and behaviors did combine to reflect degrees of neighborhood attachment, and neighborhood ties were stronger on cul-de-sacs than on through streets. Decorating at both Halloween and Christmas tended to be a block phenomenon (if the target home was decorated, so were the neighbors' homes); decorating at each time was related to aspects of neighborhood attachment. The results indicated that attachment can be a multilevel phenomenon that is related to the street's environmental design. The influence of street form is discussed as a facilitator rather than a cause of attachment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Pressures in Informal Groups
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707362 · Cited by 1,831
Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B. B. (1981) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60371-8 · Cited by 260
Self-citation
Cited by
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Perkins, D. D., Meeks, J. W., & Taylor, R. B. (1992) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80294-4 · Cited by 420
The Ecology of Empowerment: Predicting Participation in Community Organizations
Perkins, D. D., Brown, B. B., & Taylor, R. B. (1996) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1996.tb01363.x · Cited by 342
Self-citationResidential burglars judge risk: The role of territoriality
Brown, B. B., & Bentley, D. L. (1993) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80214-2 · Cited by 120
Self-citationResidential satisfaction and quality of life
Aragonés, J. I., Amérigo, M., & Pérez-López, R. (2017) · International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_17 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 539-565
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W1992548379
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Cohesiveness, Territoriality, and Holiday Decorations: The Influence of Cul-de-Sacs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013916585175001
- The paper
- Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1985). Social Cohesiveness, Territoriality, and Holiday Decorations: The Influence of Cul-de-Sacs. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916585175001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.