Environmental Attitudes and Behavior: A Pennsylvania Survey
Abstract
A statewide survey of Pennsylvanians conducted in 1990 provided data on residents' opinions about ideas contained in the new environmental paradigm (NEP) and behaviors engaged in that are environmentally protective. Although Pennsylvanians expressed support for the NEP, they were not likely to engage in actbvities that contribute to environmental protection. Correlation analysis revealed that although support for the NEP was predictive of environmental behavior, the linkages were not strong. Various social characteristics were more predictive of environmentally oriented behaviors than supportive of the NEP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior research has raised questions about the validity of attitudinal measures for assessing behaviors.
“In prior research, questions have been raised about the validity of attitudinal measures in accurately assessing behaviors (see e.g., Scott & Willits, 1994)”
From Randomized controlled trial of social interaction police training (2020) · cites this paper as Scott & Willits, 1994
Cites
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678 · see citing works
Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change
O'Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Choi, D., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2019) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.001 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Willingness of residents to participate in e-waste recycling in India
Dwivedy, M., & Mittal, R. K. (2013) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2013.03.001 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Lee, Y. K. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101930 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Randomized controlled trial of social interaction police training
McLean, K., Wolfe, S. E., Rojek, J., Alpert, G. P., & Smith, M. R. (2020) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12506 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Ifegbesan, A. (2011) · The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management · doi:10.5276/jswtm.2011.221 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scott, D., & Willits, F. K.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Metroparks (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- ORCID
- Scott, David
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-260
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2073319928
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 51.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environment and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Keywords
- environmental attitudes, environmental behavior, New Environmental Paradigm, environmental protection, public opinion, social determinants of behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review