Cited by 303Teacher Professional Development and MotivationSchool Choice and PerformanceEducation in Rural Contexts

Teacher Turnover: Examining Exit Attrition, Teaching Area Transfer, and School Migration

Open access
Boe, Erling E., Cook, Lynne H., Sunderland, Robert J.·2008·Exceptional Children

Abstract

The purposes of this research were to quantify trends in three components of teacher turnover and to investigate claims of excessive teacher turnover as the predominant source of teacher shortages. Attrition and teaching area transfer rates were comparable in special and general education and increased substantially from 1991–1992 to 2000–2001. School migration was stable over years, but higher in special than general education. Although annual turnover was high and increased to 1 in 4 teachers (25.6%) by 2000–2001, teacher attrition was lower than in other occupations. Evidence suggests that retention is unlikely to increase without dramatic improvements in the organization, management, and funding of public schools. Until then, an increased supply of qualified teachers is needed to reduce teacher shortages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001440290807500101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each year, another 20% of special educators move to general education or to a different special education role.

    “An additional 20% of special educators each year transfer to general education or to another position in special education (Boe, Cook, & Sunderland, 2008).”

    From Too Stressed to Teach? Teaching Quality, Student Engagement, and IEP Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Boe, Cook, & Sunderland, 2008

    The “SPECIAL EDUCATION: TEACHER OUT-SWITCHING AND IN-SWITCHING” section reports a figure close to 20%, but its 19% includes teachers who left teaching employment as well as those who switched teaching areas. It does not say that an additional 20% transferred to general education or another position in special education. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Billingsley, B. S. (2004). Special education teacher re- tention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature. The Journal ofSpecial Education, 38, 39-55.
  2. Billingsley, B. S. (2005). Cultivating and keeping com- mitted special education teachers: What principals and district leaders can do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  3. Billingsley, B. S., & Cross, L. H. (1991). Teachers' de- cisions to transfer from special to general education. The Journal ofSpecialtClucation, 24, 496-511.
  4. Boe, E. E., Cook, L. H., & Sunderland, R. J. (2005, July). Turnover ofspecial education teachers: New research on the extent and impact ofexit attrition, transfer to gen- eral education, and school transfer. Paper presented at the 2005 OSEP Project Directors Conference, Washing- ton, DC.
  5. Boe, E. E., & Gilford, D. M. (Eds.) (1992). Teacher supply, demand, and quality: Policy issues, models, and data bases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  6. Bureau of National Affairs. (1992). BNA's quarterly re- port on job absence and turnover: 4th quarter 1991. Bulletin to Management (March 12). Washington, DC: Author. Bureau of National Affairs. (1995). BNA's quarterly re- port on job absence and turnover: 4th quarter 1994. Bulletin to Management (March 9). Washington, DC: Author. Bureau of National Affairs. (1999). BNA's quarterly re- port on job absence and turnover: 4th quarter 1998. Bulletin to Management (Vol. 50, No. 10, Part II). Washington, DC: Authot. Bureau of National Affairs. (2000). Job absence & turnover: 4th quarter 1999. Bulletin to Management (Vol. 51, No. 10, Part II). Washington, DC: Author. Bureau of National Affairs. (2001). Job absence & turnover: 4th quarter 2000. Bulletin to Management (Vol. 52, No. 10, Part II). Washington, DC: Authot. Bureau of National Affaits. (2002). Job absence & turnover: 4th quartet 2001. Bulletin to Management (Vol. 53, No. 11, Part II). Washington, DC: Author.
  7. Guarino, C. M., Santibafiez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review rfEducational Research, 76, 173-208.
  8. Halford, ]. (1998). Easing the way for new teachers. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 33-36.
  9. In W. ]. Fowler, Jr. (Ed.), Developments in school fi- nance, 20,i3: Fiscal proceedings from the annual state data conference ofJuly 2003 (pp. 5-15). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. De- partment of Education.
  10. Ingersoll, R. M. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality: The recurting myth of teacher shortages. Teach- ers College Record, 91(1), 41-44.
  11. Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bul- letin, 86(631), 16-31.
  12. Johnson, S. M., Berg, ]. H., & Donaldson, M. L. (2005). Who stays in teaching and why? A review of the literature on teacher retention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
  13. Luekens, M. T., Lyter, D. M., & Fox, E. E. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey, 2000-01 (NCES Publication No. 2004-301). Washington, DC: National Center for Ed- ucation Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. McLeskey,]. (2005). Forward. In B. S. Billingsley, Cul- tivating and keeping committed special education teachers: What principals and district leaders can do (pp. xvi-xix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  14. McLeskey, ]., Tyler, N. c., & Flippin, S. S. (2004). The supply and demand for special education teachers: A review of research regarding the chronic shortage of special education teachers. The Journal ofSpecial Educa- tion, 38, 5-21.
  15. Podgursky, M. (2006). Is there a "qualified teacher" shortage? Education Next, 6(2), 27-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boe, E. E., Cook, L. H., & Sunderland, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • California State University, Dominguez Hills (US)
Corresponding author
Boe, Erling E.
Venue
Exceptional Children
Published
2008-10
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
7-31
ISSN
  • 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-5560
OpenAlex
W2125837342
Cited by
303
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 22
FWCI
65.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
Keywords
teacher turnover, teacher attrition, school migration, teacher shortage, special education teachers, teacher retention, teacher supply, public school administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review