The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teacher Perceptions of Mainstreaming/Inclusion, 1958–1995: A Research Synthesis
Abstract
Twenty-eight investigations were identified in which general education teachers were surveyed regarding their perceptions of including students with disabilities in their classes. Research synthesis procedures were employed to summarize responses and examine the consistency of responses across time, geographical location, and item type. Overall, we found that about two thirds of general classroom teachers supported the concept of mainstreaming/inclusion. A smaller majority were willing to include students with disabilities in their own classes, but responses appeared to vary according to disabling condition and implicit obligations on the teacher. Although about half or more of the teachers felt that mainstreaming/inclusion could provide some benefits, only one third or less of teachers believed they had sufficient time, skills, training or resources necessary for mainstreaming/inclusion. Reported attitudes did not appear to covary with either geographical region or time of publication. Implications for policy and practice are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming
Lindsay, G. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709906x156881 · Cited by 725
“Reviews have identified a number of important factors affecting teacher attitudes to inclusion (Avramidis & Norwich, 2002; Scruggs & Mastropieri, 1996).”
BackgroundAssistive Technology Use and Stigma
Parette, P., & Scherer, M. (2004) · Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416470403900304 · Cited by 272
Romi, S., & Leyser, Y. (2006) · European Journal of Special Needs Education · doi:10.1080/08856250500491880 · Cited by 225
Alternative Education Programs: Program and Student Characteristics
Foley, R. M., & Pang, L.-S. (2006) · The High School Journal · doi:10.1353/hsj.2006.0003 · Cited by 208
Qu, X. (2022) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-021-09426-2 · Cited by 48
Marshall, J., Stojanovik, V., & Ralph, S. (2002) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1080/1368282021000008892 · Cited by 20
Sharma, A., Dunay, A., & Dely, R. L. (2018) · Forum Scientiae Oeconomia · doi:10.23762/fso_vol6no1_18_5 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A.
- Venue
- Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-74
- ISSN
- 0014-4029 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5560
- OpenAlex
- W1915197889
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 142.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.