Using Performance Tasks in the Identification of Economically Disadvantaged and Minority Gifted Learners: Findings From Project STAR
Abstract
This paper discusses the rationale for developing performance assessment tasks to augment the identification of more economically disadvantaged and minority students for gifted programs in one state; provides a blue-print for the development protocol, including preteaching, rubrics, and exemplars; and shows major findings for use of the protocol with intended students. The performance assessment tasks were developed and revised based on try-out, pilot, and field test data collected across multiple districts with more than 4,000 students at primary and intermediate grades. Appropriate technical adequacy data were used for decision making on task and rubric revisions. Criterion levels of performance within domains were developed to ensure inclusion of populations of interest without compromising the integrity of the task protocols. The performance assessment tasks of Project STAR resulted in finding an additional group of students who were 12% African American and 14(Y) low-income children dunng the field test of the instrument. These students represent those who would not have qualified for gifted programs using traditional measures. In that sense, the assessment approach yields a “value-added” component to the state identification system. Thus, Project STAR provides an effective and innovative approach to finding more low-SES and minority gifted students for programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding performance-based assessments to the state's existing identification system resulted in identifying an additional group of students who were 12% African American and 14% low income.
“Results showed that adding performancebased assessments to the state's existing identification system resulted in the identification of an additional group of students who were 12% African American and 14% low income.”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as VanTassel-Baska et al. 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
- Authors
- VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. D.
- Affiliations
- The College of William and Mary
- William & Mary (US)
- Venue
- Gifted Child Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-123
- ISSN
- 0016-9862 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-9041
- OpenAlex
- W2034311828
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gifted Child Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- gifted identification, performance evaluation, low-income students, Project STAR, low-income children, African American students, rubrics, criterion-referenced assessment, value-added assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review