The Enrichment Triad Model: a Plan for Developing Defensible Programs for the Gifted and Talented
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For many years, Renzulli's enrichment triad has been the most widely used model in US schools.
“For many years, the most widely used model in US schools has been Renzulli's (1977Renzulli's ( , 2016;;Renzulli & Reis 1997) enrichment triad.”
From Gifted Students (2019) · cites this paper as Renzulli 1977
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Worrell, F. C., Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Dixson, D. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
- Authors
- Renzulli, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Renzulli, Joseph S.
- ORCID
- Renzulli, Joseph S.
- Venue
- Gifted Child Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1977-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-233
- ISSN
- 0016-9862 (ISSN-L)
- 1934-9041
- OpenAlex
- W4232156175
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gifted Child Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Keywords
- gifted education, program development, program evaluation, gifted students, curriculum enrichment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
