Cited by 397Social Robot Interaction and HRIHuman-Automation Interaction and SafetyAI in Service Interactions

Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Meta-Analytic Findings

Kaplan, Alexandra D., Kessler, Theresa T., Brill, J. Christopher, Hancock, P. A.·2023·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Abstract

Objective: The present meta-analysis sought to determine significant factors that predict trust in artificial intelligence (AI). Such factors were divided into those relating to (a) the human trustor, (b) the AI trustee, and (c) the shared context of their interaction. Background: There are many factors influencing trust in robots, automation, and technology in general, and there have been several meta-analytic attempts to understand the antecedents of trust in these areas. However, no targeted meta-analysis has been performed examining the antecedents of trust in AI. Method: Data from 65 articles examined the three predicted categories, as well as the subcategories of human characteristics and abilities, AI performance and attributes, and contextual tasking. Lastly, four common uses for AI (i.e., chatbots, robots, automated vehicles, and nonembodied, plain algorithms) were examined as further potential moderating factors. Results: Results showed that all of the examined categories were significant predictors of trust in AI as well as many individual antecedents such as AI reliability and anthropomorphism, among many others. Conclusion: Overall, the results of this meta-analysis determined several factors that influence trust, including some that have no bearing on AI performance. Additionally, we highlight the areas where there is currently no empirical research. Application: Findings from this analysis will allow designers to build systems that elicit higher or lower levels of trust, as they require.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00187208211013988

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kaplan et al. extended system-related antecedents of trust in artificial intelligence by adding human-related and context-related antecedents.

    “While all three factors, performance, process, and purpose, relate to the system itself, in a recent meta-analysis, Kaplan et al. [60] extended these system-related antecedents of trust in artifcial intelligence by adding human-related antecedents of trust (e.g., individual's disposition to trust and ability, attitudes), and context-related antecedents of trust (e.g., risk of the situation).”
  • The antecedents of trust uncovered in prior reviews vary across contexts.

    “we see that the antecedents of trust uncovered in these reviews vary across contexts.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 397

Authors
Kaplan, A. D., Kessler, T. T., Brill, J. C., & Hancock, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Georgia Tech Research Institute (US)
  • United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Alexandra D.
Venue
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Published
2021-05-28
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
337-359
ISSN
  • 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-8181
OpenAlex
W3165767308
Cited by
397
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 2
FWCI
31.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
trust in AI, antecedents of trust, human-AI interaction, AI reliability, anthropomorphism, AI performance, chatbots, robots, autonomous vehicles
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review