The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Being yourself ’ in the electronic sweatshop: New forms of normative control
Abstract
This article extends research about high-commitment management practices in tightly controlled work environments typified by the call centre. One promising research avenue suggests that normative management systems in such contexts, involving ‘fun’ exercises and culture programmes, etc., are more about distracting employee attention away from other, more taxing controls. This article develops such an approach by exploring the specific nature and conditions of such distraction. An empirical study of a call centre in which employees were encouraged to ‘ just be themselves’ (in relation to lifestyle differences, sexuality, diverse identities, etc.) reveals how the distractions are partly informed by the dysfunctions of existing technical, bureaucratic and conventional cultural controls, all of which homogenize workers. Furthermore, the new regime not only serves to distract employees, but proves instrumental in capturing their sociality, energy and ‘authentic’ or ‘non-work’ personalities as emotional labour. At the same time, it gives rise to some contestation and less individualistic forms of authenticity. These outcomes have wider implications for our understanding of worker autonomy in and around hybrid control systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Out of Sight But Not Out of Mind: Managing Invisible Social Identities in the Workplace
Clair, J. A., Beatty, J. E., & Maclean, T. L. (2005) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2005.15281431 · Cited by 866
Entrapped by the ‘electronic panopticon’? Worker resistance in the call centre
Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (2000) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/1468-005x.00061 · Cited by 546
Guignon, C. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203646793 · Cited by 382
Sturdy, A., & Fleming, P. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00359 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Cited by
Labour process theory and the gig economy
Gandini, A. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718790002 · Cited by 946
The human capital hoax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization
Fleming, P. (2017) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840616686129 · Cited by 473
Self-citationLehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0047 · Cited by 317
Digital labour at economic margins: African workers and the global information economy
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2020) · Review of African Political Economy · doi:10.1080/03056244.2020.1728243 · Cited by 94
Scherer, A. G., & Neesham, C. (2023) · Organization Theory · doi:10.1177/26317877231204083 · Cited by 30
Technology introduction on ships: The tension between safety and economic rationality
Bhardwaj, S., Bhattacharya, S., Tang, L., & Howell, K. E. (2019) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.025 · Cited by 19
Outsourcing your Life: Exploitation and Exploration in “the 4-Hour Workweek”
Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2012) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000037012 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-09-23
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-200
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2148765393
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.