Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention
Abstract
In recent years, research on mindfulness has burgeoned across several lines of scholarship. Nevertheless, very little empirical research has investigated mindfulness from a workplace perspective. In the study reported here, we address this oversight by examining workplace mindfulness – the degree to which individuals are mindful in their work setting. We hypothesize that, in a dynamic work environment, workplace mindfulness is positively related to job performance and negatively related to turnover intention, and that these relationships account for variance beyond the effects of constructs occupying a similar conceptual space – namely, the constituent dimensions of work engagement (vigor, dedication, and absorption). Testing these claims in a dynamic service industry context, we find support for a positive relationship between workplace mindfulness and job performance that holds even when accounting for all three work engagement dimensions. We also find support for a negative relationship between workplace mindfulness and turnover intention, though this relationship becomes insignificant when accounting for the dimensions of work engagement. We consider the theoretical and practical implications of these findings and highlight a number of avenues for conducting research on mindfulness in the workplace.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 120 · Cited by 568
- Authors
- Dane, E., & Brummel, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- University of Tulsa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dane, Erik
- Brummel, Bradley J
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06-03
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-128
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2156656773
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 12
- FWCI
- 50.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Washington University in St. Louis
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
- Keywords
- workplace mindfulness, employee performance, turnover intention, work engagement, vigor, dedication, absorption, service industry employees, dynamic work environments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review