The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities
Abstract
Higher education has been subject to substantial reforms as new forms of performance management are implemented in universities across the world. Extant research suggests that in many cases performance management systems have disrupted academic life. We complement this literature with an extensive mixed methods study of how the performance management system is understood by academics across universities and departments in Finland at a time when new management principles and practices are being forcefully introduced. While our survey results enabled us to map the generally critical and negative view that Finnish scholars have of performance management, the qualitative inquiry allowed us to disentangle how and why our respondents resent the ways and means of measuring their work, the assumptions that underlie the measurement, and the university ideal on which the performance management system is rooted. Most significantly, we highlight how the proliferation of performance management can be seen as a catalyst for changing the very ethos of what it is to be an academic and to do academic work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drucker, P. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780080942360 · Cited by 3,745
Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004) · OUP Catalogue · Cited by 3,535
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708094863 · Cited by 3,462
The New Production of Knowledge
Gibbons, M. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,405
Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation
Clark, B. R. (1998) · Cited by 2,867
Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100037 · Cited by 1,922
Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities
Fairclough, N. (1993) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926593004002002 · Cited by 1,815
Qualitative Methods in Business Research
Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857028044 · Cited by 1,353
Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis
(2000) · Managerial Auditing Journal · doi:10.1108/maj.2000.15.5.253.3 · Cited by 1,221
Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality
Hines, R. D. (1988) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7 · Cited by 1,175
Cited by
Morsing, M., & Spence, L. J. (2019) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718804306 · Cited by 135
Transitions from Undergraduate to Taught Postgraduate Study: Emotion, Integration and Belonging
McPherson, C., Punch, S., & Graham, E. (2017) · Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice · doi:10.14297/jpaap.v5i2.265 · Cited by 53
Kjærgaard, A., Mikkelsen, E. N., & Buhl-Wiggers, J. (2023) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/13505076221101146 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, J., & Hyvönen, T.
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-10-26
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 685-709
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W2243079250
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 78.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0018726715596802
- The paper
- Kallio, K.-M., Kallio, T. J., Tienari, J., & Hyvönen, T. (2016). Ethos at stake: Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715596802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.