Cited by 18Personality Traits and PsychologyJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

Paradoxical effects of narcissism on creative performance: Roles of leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence and follower identification with the leader

Liu, Xin, Zheng, Xiaoming, Zhang, Yucheng, Liao, Hui, Harms, Peter D, Qin, Xin, Yu, Yu·2025·Human Relations

Abstract

What is the effect of trait narcissism on creative performance? Although both constructs share an emphasis on uniqueness and novelty, prior investigations of the narcissism–creative performance relationship have produced inconsistent findings and failed to provide conclusive answers to this question. One possible reason for the seemingly contradictory evidence is that extant research has examined the influences of leader and follower narcissism separately rather than simultaneously. In this study, we address this issue by investigating leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence to comprehensively understand when and why leader or follower narcissism is beneficial or detrimental to creative performance. Integrating the self-orientation model of narcissism and narcissistic-tolerance theory, we posit that leader and follower narcissism jointly influence creative performance via identification with the leader, and that different leader–follower narcissism (in)congruence combinations exhibit distinct effects. The analyses of two-wave, two-level, and multi-source data from 421 followers and 54 direct leaders, using cross-level polynomial regressions, support our hypotheses: (1) identification with the leader is maximized when leader narcissism and follower narcissism are congruent; (2) identification with the leader is minimized when leader narcissism is higher than follower narcissism; and (3) identification with the leader mediates the effects of leader–follower narcissism (in)con…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00187267241251983

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 111 · Cited by 18

Authors
Liu, X., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Liao, H., Harms, P. D., Qin, X., & Yu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Xin
  • Zheng, Xiaoming
  • Zhang, Yucheng
  • Liao, Hui
  • Harms, Peter D
  • Qin, Xin
  • Yu, Yu
Venue
Human Relations
Published
2024-05-19
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
517-549
ISSN
  • 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-282X
OpenAlex
W4398137518
Cited by
18
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Relations (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72002214, 72172074, 72272048, 72272155, 72325012, 72372151)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
narcissism, creative performance, leader narcissism, followers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review