Reflexivity
Abstract
Just as the concept "paradigm" energized the human sciences in spite of its many definitions and uses, so now does the concept "reflexive" seem to be of increasing salience, again with many definitions and uses. It is argued that reflexivity, as a fundamental human quality underlies various attempts to understand and intervene in human relationships. By juxtaposing paradigms, reflexivity, and therapeutic progression it is possible to set out several types of reflexivity, some relatively self-contained and others at the edge of our possible "knowledges."
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several other included articles had authors note their perspectives, experiences, and expertise related to the research focus, demonstrating some reflexivity engagement.
“Though only a small proportion of the articles had a positionality statement present, several others had authors note their perspectives, experiences, and expertise related to the research focus, thus demonstrating some reflexivity engagement (47).”
From Exploring public health education’s integration of critical race theories: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 139
- Authors
- Holland, R.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Holland, Ray
- Venue
- Human Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-484
- ISSN
- 0018-7267 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-282X
- OpenAlex
- W4210469988
- Cited by
- 139
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Relations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
- Keywords
- reflexivity, treatment advances, paradigm, interpersonal relationships, therapeutic interventions, human qualities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
