Cited by 389Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityLabor Law and Work Dynamics

Why Employers Use Flexible Staffing Arrangements: Evidence from an Establishment Survey

Houseman, Susan N.·2001·ILR Review

Abstract

Drawing on a nationally representative survey of private sector establishments, the author presents new evidence on which employers use flexible staffing arrangements and why they use them. The surveyed employers made widespread use not only of regular part-time workers but also of short-term hires, on-call workers, agency temporaries, and contract workers. Two-thirds expected flexible staffing use to increase in their industry in the near future. Most commonly cited as reasons for using all types of flexible staffing arrangements were the needs to adjust for workload fluctuations and staff absences. Many employers also used agency temporaries and part-time workers to screen workers for regular positions. In addition, the survey evidence points to savings on benefits costs as an important factor in employers' decisions to use most flexible arrangements. The author examines the implications of why employers use the various types of flexible staffing arrangements for workers and public policy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/001979390105500109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temporary arrangements are often used by the client company as a tool for recruitment and selection.

    “In fact, it is known that the temporary arrangements are often used by the client company as a tool for recruitment and selection [67].”

    From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [67]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houseman, S. N.
Affiliations
Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE)
Corresponding author
Houseman, Susan N.
Venue
ILR Review
Published
2001-10
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
149-170
ISSN
  • 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-271X
OpenAlex
W4292360438
Cited by
389
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
25.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
part-time workers, contract workers, workforce flexibility, workload fluctuation, staff absence, applicant screening, labour market policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review