Why Employers Use Flexible Staffing Arrangements: Evidence from an Establishment Survey
Abstract
Drawing on a nationally representative survey of private sector establishments, the author presents new evidence on which employers use flexible staffing arrangements and why they use them. The surveyed employers made widespread use not only of regular part-time workers but also of short-term hires, on-call workers, agency temporaries, and contract workers. Two-thirds expected flexible staffing use to increase in their industry in the near future. Most commonly cited as reasons for using all types of flexible staffing arrangements were the needs to adjust for workload fluctuations and staff absences. Many employers also used agency temporaries and part-time workers to screen workers for regular positions. In addition, the survey evidence points to savings on benefits costs as an important factor in employers' decisions to use most flexible arrangements. The author examines the implications of why employers use the various types of flexible staffing arrangements for workers and public policy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Temporary arrangements are often used by the client company as a tool for recruitment and selection.
“In fact, it is known that the temporary arrangements are often used by the client company as a tool for recruitment and selection [67].”
From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [67]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Labor Market Intermediaries and the New Paradigm for Human Resources
Bonet, R., Cappelli, P., & Hamori, M. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.774213 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
The unexpected side of relational e-HRM: Developing trust in the HR department
Bissola, R., & Imperatori, B. (2014) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-07-2013-0078 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The influence of independent contractors on organizational effectiveness: A review
Flinchbaugh, C., Zare, M., Chadwick, C., Li, P., & Essman, S. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.002 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis
Sobral, F., Chambel, M. J., & Castanheira, F. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18136779 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Houseman, S. N.
- Affiliations
- Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Houseman, Susan N.
- ORCID
- Houseman, Susan N.
- Venue
- ILR Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-170
- ISSN
- 0019-7939 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-271X
- OpenAlex
- W4292360438
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 25.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial and Labor Relations Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
- Keywords
- part-time workers, contract workers, workforce flexibility, workload fluctuation, staff absence, applicant screening, labour market policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review