The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline
Abstract
More than two decades ago, the authors of Political Action (Barnes et al. 1979) predicted that what was then called “unconventional political participation” would become more widespread throughout advanced industrial societies, because it was part of a deep-rooted intergenerational change. Time series data from the 1974 Political Action survey, together with data from four waves of the World Values Surveys demonstrates that this change has indeed taken place—to such an extent that petitions, boycotts, and other forms of direct action are no longer unconventional but have become more or less normal actions for a large part of the citizenry of post-industrial societies. This type of elite-challenging actions also played an important part in the Third Wave of democratization—but after the transition to democracy, most of the new democracies subsequently experienced a post-honeymoon phase of disillusionment with democracy, in which direct political action declined. This paper analyzes data from more than 70 countries containing more than 80 percent of the world’s population, interpreting the long-term dynamics of elite-challenging political participation in both established democracies and new democracies. Our interpretation implies that the current decline in direct political action in the new democracies is a “post-honeymoon” period effect; in the long run, we expect that elite-challenging activity will move on an upward trajectory in most of the new democracies, as has been the case in virtually all established democracies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Self-citation
Cited by
A conceptual map of political participation
van Deth, J. W. (2014) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/ap.2014.6 · Cited by 610
Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381613000431 · Cited by 401
Oser, J. (2017) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1364-8 · Cited by 75
Political Veganism: An Empirical Analysis of Vegans’ Motives, Aims, and Political Engagement
Kalte, D. (2021) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0032321720930179 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Inglehart, R., & Catterberg, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Comparative Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3-5
- Pages
- 300-316
- ISSN
- 0020-7152 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2554
- OpenAlex
- W2129242889
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002071520204300305
- The paper
- Inglehart, R., & Catterberg, G. (2002). Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/002071520204300305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.