Cited by 44Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The impact of insight on social functioning in patients with schizophrenia

Erol, Almila, Delibas, Hakan, Bora, Ozlem, Mete, Levent·2015·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: It is still unclear whether insight has a direct association with social functioning in schizophrenia, independent of its association with symptoms. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationship of insight and its dimensions with social functioning in schizophrenia. Methods: A total of 170 outpatients with schizophrenia were included in this study. All patients were evaluated with the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). Patients with impaired insight and patients with unimpaired insight were compared for PSP score through independent samples t test. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to determine the correlations between study variables. Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was used in order to determine the variables that predict social performance. Results: The PSP score of patients with impaired insight was significantly lower than that of patients with unimpaired insight. There were significant correlations between insight dimensions and PSP score. PANSS negative scale score, awareness of achieved effects of medication and awareness of anhedonia/asociality were significant predictors of social performance. Conclusion: Insight has a significant impact on social functioning in schizophrenia, and some, but not all, insight dimensions have direct impact on social performance, independent of their association with symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764014548287

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 44

Authors
Erol, A., Delibas, H., Bora, O., & Mete, L.
Affiliations
  • Clinic of Psychiatry, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
  • Clinic of Psychiatry, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
  • Clinic of Psychiatry, Gaziemir State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
  • Izmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2014-09-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
379-385
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W2007050166
Cited by
44
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
insight, schizophrenia, social functioning, social performance, Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder, anhedonia, asociality, negative symptoms, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review