‘From my point of view, my wife has recovered': a qualitative investigation of caregivers' perceptions of recovery and peer support services for people with bipolar disorder in a Chinese community
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic mental disorder, and family members play a key role in taking care of the affected individuals. The recovery movement has gradually transformed mental health services, for example, through the introduction of peer support services (sharing of expert-by-experience knowledge), and it has challenged the prevailing view that people with mental illness cannot recover. AIMS: Through this study, the researchers explored how family caregivers in a Chinese context conceptualise recovery, how caregivers interact with peer support workers (PSWs) and how they perceive peer support services. METHODS: Fourteen family caregivers from community settings participated in individual semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed through thematic analysis. RESULTS: Family caregivers had multifaceted definitions of recovery and had various degrees of contact with PSWs. The views and experiences shared by PSWs were hope-instilling for caregivers and changed their perception of BD and their loved ones. Some limitations of PSWs were also identified. CONCLUSION: Social connectedness and functional outcomes were important indicators of recovery among Chinese family caregivers. Caregivers began to understand the benefits of PSWs after experiencing their services. Peer-led services could be a helpful support for both service users and family caregivers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers' definitions of recovery concentrated mainly around users being attentive to others' needs and able to establish positive connections.
“Within this theme, caregivers' definitions of recovery concentrated mainly around users being attentive to others' needs and able to establish positive connections.”
From Recovery from Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Yuen, W. W., Tse, S., Murray, G., & Davidson, L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Social Work & Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tse, Samson
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-15
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 305-312
- ISSN
- 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2854
- OpenAlex
- W2939599214
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (General Research Fund Project Number: 17611815)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- bipolar disorder, family caregivers, recovery, peer support services, peer support workers, caregiver perceptions, Chinese community, social connectedness, functional outcome, hope, community mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, China, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Social Support, Caregivers, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review