Cited by 78Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Dual diagnosis: A systematic review of the organization of community health services

Fantuzzi, Claudia, Mezzina, Roberto·2020·International Journal of Social Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Dual diagnosis (DD), as the co-occurrence of a substance use disorder and a psychiatric disorder, is underestimated, under-diagnosed and often poorly treated throughout the world, although it is highly prevalent in people suffering from a mental disorder. Aims and methods This review analyzed 48 studies from a PubMed and PsycINFO databases search, in order to verify the state of the art regarding the organization of community health services for DD treatment. Results Four macro-themes have been identified: service organization, critical issues, assessment tools and evidence-based interventions. An effective service recognizes the complexity of DD, promotes a common staff culture, and tailors the organization to local needs. The main critical issues in its implementation include the lack of specific staff training, the poor management of resources and the need for greater personalization of care plans, with attention to psychosocial interventions. Integrated service assessment tools can be used as a benchmark measure at the program level for implementation planning and at the national level to affect policy change. The integrated treatment model for DD should also aim to improve access to care and offer treatments based on scientific evidence. It is also evident that the integration of services can improve outcomes but it is not a guarantee for it. Conclusion There is an urgent need to improve networking between mental health and addiction services in order to deal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020764019899975

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequential or parallel treatments have produced health improvements but are generally considered suboptimal and less effective than integrated care for A-SUD.

    “These approaches have historically led to health improvement, but are not considered optimal and generally underperform relative to integrated care for A-SUD(Brewer et al., 2017; Fantuzzi & Mezzina, 2020; McGovern et al., 2014; Mueser, 2003; Spivak et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fantuzzi, C., & Mezzina, R.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Salute Mentale, ASUI Trieste, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training, Trieste, Italy
Corresponding author
Fantuzzi, Claudia
Venue
International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Published
2020-01-20
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
300-310
ISSN
  • 0020-7640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2854
OpenAlex
W3002654043
Cited by
78
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
dual diagnosis, substance use disorders, mental illness, integrated treatment, community-based care, service organizations, employee training, psychosocial interventions, assessment instruments, evidence-based interventions, health care access
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Community Health Services, Humans, Models, Organizational, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Evidence-Based Medicine, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review