CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54Social Work Education and PracticeSocial Sciences and PoliciesCounseling Practices and Supervision

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social work ethics: Professional codes in Australia and the United States

Congress, Elaine, McAuliffe, Donna·2006·International Social Work
DOI 10.1177/0020872806061211
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

English This article compares and contrasts two main areas of the Australian and US codes of ethics for social workers. These have been selected for comparison because recent revisions in their provisions about dual relationships and confidentiality raise challenging questions about acceptable practice standards. French Cet article compare et contraste deux grands domaines des codes d'éthique pour les travailleurs sociaux d'Australie et des Etats-Unis. Ces deux codes d'éthique ont été sélectionnés pour comparaison en raison de leurs récentes révisions aux niveaux des 'relations doubles' et de la confidentialité. Ces questions posent des défis de taille quant aux normes de pratiques acceptables. Spanish Se comparan dos áreas principales de los códigos de trabajo social de Australia y de los Estados Unidos. Se eligieron estos dos códigos para comparación porque sus revisiones recientes acerca de relaciones duales y de secreto profesional suscitan cuestiones difíciles acerca de estándares aceptables.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020872806061211

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Abbott, A., 1988, Professional Choices: Values at Work
  2. 10.1177/002087289904200407 · DOI
  3. 10.1606/1044-3894.901 · DOI
  4. American Psychological Association (APA), 2002, Ethical Principles of Psychologists
  5. 10.1080/03124070108414320 · DOI
  6. Australian Association of Social Work (AASW), 1999, Code of Ethics
  7. Australian Association of Social Work, 2004, By-Laws on Ethics
  8. Australian Psychological Society, 2005, Code of Ethics
  9. Banks, S., 2001, Ethics and Values in Social Work
  10. 10.1046/j.0312-407X.2003.00054.x · DOI
  11. Black, P., 2002, Teaching Social Work Values and Ethics: A Curriculum Resource
  12. 10.1080/03124079708415749 · DOI
  13. Brownlee, K., 1996, Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 497, 10.1007/BF02251048 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/03124079708415742 · DOI
  15. Congress, E., 1990, Crisis Intervention Handbook: Assessment, Treatment, and Research, 221
  16. 10.1300/J001v10n01_13 · DOI
  17. Congress, E., 1999, Social Work Values and Ethics: Identifying and Resolving Professional Dilemmas
  18. 10.18060/124 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/10437797.2001.10779052 · DOI
  20. Congress, E., 1997, Controversial Issues in Social Work Ethics, Values and Obligations, 137
  21. 10.1080/03124079708415745 · DOI
  22. Dean, R.G., 1992, Social Work, 37, 128
  23. 10.1080/03124079708415741 · DOI
  24. Gambrill, E., 1992, Controversial Issues in Social Work
  25. Gambrill, E., 1997, Controversial Issues in Social Work Ethics, Values and Obligations
  26. Healy, L., 2001, International Social Work: Professional Action in an Interdependent World
  27. Holland, T.P., 1991, Social Work, 36, 138
  28. 10.1046/j.0312-407X.2003.00051.x · DOI
  29. 10.1080/15426432.1989.10383649 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/sw/42.2.187 · DOI
  31. 10.1080/00220612.1979.10671570 · DOI
  32. Kagle, J., 1994, Social Work, 31, 213
  33. 10.1300/J010v17n04_04 · DOI
  34. Kutchins, H., 1991, Social Work, 36, 106
  35. 10.1080/03124079708415743 · DOI
  36. Loewenberg, F.M., 2000, Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice
  37. 10.5840/profethics199973/418 · DOI
  38. McAuliffe, D. (2000) ‘Beyond the Hypothetical: Ethical Dilemmas in Front-line Social Work’. Unpublished thesis, Australia: University of Queensland.
  39. 10.1080/03124079908416193 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/03124079708415746 · DOI
  41. McLeod, D., 1967, Behavioural Science for Social Work
  42. 10.1093/sw/47.1.55 · DOI
  43. National Association of Social Work, 1999, Code of Ethics
  44. Pumphrey, M., 1959, Teaching of Values and Ethics in Social Work Education
  45. 10.1093/sw/28.1.31 · DOI
  46. 10.7312/ream92298 · DOI
  47. Reamer, F.G., 1995, Social Work, 40, 595
  48. Reamer, F.G., 1998, Ethical Standards in Social Work: A Critical Review of the NASW Code of Ethics
  49. 10.1093/sw/43.6.488 · DOI
  50. Rhodes, M.L., 1986, Ethical Dilemmas in Social Work Practice
  51. 10.1177/104438949207300105 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/03124079708415747 · DOI
  53. Rothman, J.C., 1998, From the Front Lines – Student Cases in Social Work Ethics
  54. 10.1080/03124079708415744 · DOI
  55. Steinman, S., 1998, The Ethical Decision-Making Manual for Helping Professionals
  56. 10.1606/1044-3894.1473 · DOI
  57. Thyer, B.A., 1997, Controversial Issues in Social Work Practice
  58. Varley, B., 1963, Social Work, 8, 102
  59. 10.1080/00220612.1968.10778689 · DOI
  60. 10.1177/104438949007100201 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Congress, E., & McAuliffe, D.
Affiliations
  • Fordham University (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Congress, Elaine
ORCID
McAuliffe, Donna
Venue
International Social Work
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2006-03
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
151-164
ISSN
  • 0020-8728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7234
DOI
10.1177/0020872806061211
OpenAlex
W2111352042
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • International Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
social work ethics, code of ethics, dual relationships, confidentiality, comparative ethics, professional practice standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review