Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 152Social Work Education and PracticeSocial Sciences and PoliciesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Universalism and cultural relativism in social work ethics

Healy, Lynne M.·2007·International Social Work

Abstract

English Given globalization and increasing multiculturalism, growing numbers of social workers face the challenges of respecting culture while upholding professional ethics. This article examines the perspectives of universalism and cultural relativism as applied to ethical decision-making in social work. A moderately universalist stance is recommended for social work, as valuing both diversity and human rights. French Face à la mondialisation et à l'augmentation du multiculturalisme, un nombre croissant de travailleurs sociaux font face à des défis dans un contexte qui demande de tenir compte à la fois du respect culturel et de l'éthique professionnelle. Cet article examine l'application de prises de décisions éthiques dans des perspectives universalistes et de relativisme culturel en travail social. Une position universaliste modérée est recommandée pour le travail social, valorisant à la fois la diversité culturelle et les droits humains. Spanish Dada la globalización y el multiculturalismo creciente, los trabajadores sociales se encuentran con el reto de respetar tanto la cultura como la ética profesional. Se examina la aplicación de las perspectivas universalistas y del relativismo cultural al proceso de decisión ética en trabajo social. Se recomienda una postura universalista moderada que respete tanto la diversidad como los derechos humanos.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0020872807071479

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Canadian Association of Social Workers, 1994, Social Work Code of Ethics
  2. Carr, R., 2003, Caribbean Journal of Social Work, 2, 71
  3. 10.2307/761878 · DOI
  4. 1997, The Indian Journal of Social Work, 58, 335
  5. Dolgoff, R., 2005, Ethical Decisions for Social Work Practice
  6. Donaldson, T., 1996, Harvard Business Review, 74, 48
  7. 10.2307/762182 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/002087288903200104 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3 · DOI
  10. International Federation of Social Workers, 1994, International Code of Ethics for the Professional Social Worker
  11. International Federation of Social Workers, 2000, ‘Global Definition of Social Work’
  12. International Federation of Social Workers, 2004, ‘Ethics in Social Work, Statement of Principles’
  13. Jessop, D., 1998, The Sunday Observer (Jamaica), 13
  14. Lane, T. S., Annual Program Meeting, Council on Social Work Education
  15. Mayer, A. E., 1995, Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives
  16. Mutua, M., 2000, ‘The African Human Rights System: A Critical Evaluation’
  17. National Association of Social Workers (NASW), 1996, Code of Ethics
  18. National Association of Social Workers (NASW), 2001, NASW Standards for Cultural Competence in Social Work Practice
  19. Oloka-Onyango, J., 2000, ‘Human Rights and Sustainable Development in Contemporary Africa: A New Dawn, or Retreating Horizons?’
  20. Rao, A., 1995, Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives
  21. Silvawe, G. W., 1995, British Journal of Social Work, 25, 71
  22. United Nations (UN), 1979, ‘Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’
  23. UN, 1994, Human Rights and Social Work: A Manual for Schools of Social Work and the Social Work Profession
  24. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), 1997, The Progress of Nations 1997
  25. 10.18356/68b83600-en · DOI

Cited by

See all 152

Metadata

Authors
Healy, L. M.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Healy, Lynne M.
Venue
International Social Work
Published
2007-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
11-26
ISSN
  • 0020-8728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7234
OpenAlex
W2145296611
Cited by
152
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
13.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Social Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
universalism, cultural relativism, social work ethics, ethical decision-making, multiculturalism, globalization, cultural diversity, human rights, professional ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universalism and cultural relativism in social work ethics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0020872807071479
The paper
Healy, L. M. (2007). Universalism and cultural relativism in social work ethics. International Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872807071479

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.