Cited by 10Historical Astronomy and Related StudiesHistorical and Architectural StudiesAncient Egypt and Archaeology

Probable Identification of the Ancient Egyptian Circumpolar Constellations

Locher, Kurt·1985·Journal for the History of Astronomy

Abstract

La seule identification bien etablie est celle de la Grande Ourse : la Patte de devant (Mshtyw). A partir de celle-ci, l'A. propose quelques autres identifications : le Crocodile, l'Hippopotame, le Piquet d'amarrage et le dieu Anu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002182868501600907

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The star 'akh of Meskhet(yu)' corresponds to Alkaid (ζ UMa).

    “This corresponds to Alkaid ( Z UMa) (Locher 1985; Leitz 1991).”

    From Egyptian Constellations (2015) · cites this paper as Locher 1985

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Locher, K.
Affiliations
Kantonsschule, Wetzikon, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Locher, Kurt
Venue
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Published
1985-02
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
S152-S153
ISSN
  • 0021-8286 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-8556
OpenAlex
W1614159361
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the History of Astronomy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Keywords
Great Bear, anus, Egyptian astronomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review