The DOI matches its Crossref record.
We Are All Equal Before the Law
Abstract
One constitution follows another in my country and all of them place emphasis, when they deal with individual rights and guarantees, on accentuating the equality of all Brazilians without racial distinction. Thus, they decree the legal annulment of racial differences, to cleanse the brutal slaver tradition which, still today, inhabits the historical subconsciousness of our country. For more than four centuries Black people were an article of trade, an instrument of labor and an object of domination by a society that denied them, explicitly, their very right to the human condition. This guilty subconscious is reflected in all pertinent legislation, beginning with the Golden Law (Lei Aurea) of 1888, which abolished slavery. The idea is to demonstrate that there are no whites or Blacks, but only Brazilians, not classified by racial origin. The current Constitution, decreed by the Military Junta on October 17, 1979, does not shirk its duty of noting this permanent preoccupation of a society still stained by the odious recent tradition. In its Chapter IV, which deals with individual rights and guarantees (Article 153), it declares, textually, in paragraph 1:
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Political discourses have portrayed Latin American countries as racial democracies (Rodrigues Alves 1980; Wade 2008aWade , 2008b; Alberto and Hoffnung-Garskof 2018; Schwartzman 2020).”
From Maroon Socioterritorial Movements (2022) · cites this paper as Rodrigues Alves 1980
Citations
Cited by
Maroon Socioterritorial Movements
Guillen, A. L. Z. (2022) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2021.1959293 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Alves, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Rio de Janeiro
- Venue
- Journal of Black Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-193
- ISSN
- 0021-9347
- 1552-4566
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: We Are All Equal Before the Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002193478001100202
- The paper
- Alves, S. R. (1980). We Are All Equal Before the Law. Journal of Black Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193478001100202