Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

We Are All Equal Before the Law

Alves, Sebastiao Rodrigues·1980·Journal of Black Studies

Abstract

One constitution follows another in my country and all of them place emphasis, when they deal with individual rights and guarantees, on accentuating the equality of all Brazilians without racial distinction. Thus, they decree the legal annulment of racial differences, to cleanse the brutal slaver tradition which, still today, inhabits the historical subconsciousness of our country. For more than four centuries Black people were an article of trade, an instrument of labor and an object of domination by a society that denied them, explicitly, their very right to the human condition. This guilty subconscious is reflected in all pertinent legislation, beginning with the Golden Law (Lei Aurea) of 1888, which abolished slavery. The idea is to demonstrate that there are no whites or Blacks, but only Brazilians, not classified by racial origin. The current Constitution, decreed by the Military Junta on October 17, 1979, does not shirk its duty of noting this permanent preoccupation of a society still stained by the odious recent tradition. In its Chapter IV, which deals with individual rights and guarantees (Article 153), it declares, textually, in paragraph 1:

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002193478001100202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Alves, S. R.
Affiliations
Rio de Janeiro
Venue
Journal of Black Studies
Published
1980-12
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
179-193
ISSN
  • 0021-9347
  • 1552-4566
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: We Are All Equal Before the Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002193478001100202
The paper
Alves, S. R. (1980). We Are All Equal Before the Law. Journal of Black Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193478001100202