CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 534Economic Growth and ProductivityPolitical Conflict and GovernanceNatural Resources and Economic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic Growth, Civil Wars, and Spatial Spillovers

MURDOCH, JAMES C., SANDLER, TODD·2002·Journal of Conflict Resolution
DOI 10.1177/0022002702046001006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A neoclassical growth model is used to empirically test for the influences of a civil war on steady-state income per capita both at home and in neighboring countries. This model provides the basis for measuring long-run and short-run effects of civil wars on income per capita growth in the host country and its neighbors. Evidence of significant collateral damage on economic growth in neighboring nations is uncovered. In addition, this damage is attributed to country-specific influences rather than to migration, human capital, or investment factors. As the intensity of the measure used to proxy the conflict increases, there are enhanced neighbor spillovers. Moreover, collateral damage from civil wars to growth is more pronounced in the short run.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002702046001006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Barro, Robert J., 1996, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 86, 218
  2. Barro, Robert J., 1995, Economic growth
  3. Bond, Stephen, Anke Hoeffler, and Jonathan Temple. 1999. GMM estimation of growth models. Unpublished manuscript, Oxford University, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  4. Bruk, S. I., 1964, Atlas naradov mira (Atlas of the people of the world)
  5. Singer, J. David, 1993, Correlates of war project: International and civil war data, 1816-1992 (ICPSR 9905)
  6. Sollenberg, Margereta, 1999, SIPRI yearbook 1999: Armaments, disarmament and international security, 15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–527 of 527

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
MURDOCH, J. C., & SANDLER, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
ORCID
SANDLER, TODD
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-02
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
91-110
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
DOI
10.1177/0022002702046001006
OpenAlex
W1969679372
Cited by
534
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
47.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
Keywords
civil war, economic growth, spatial spillover effects, neighboring countries, per capita income, neoclassical growth model, conflict intensity, short-run and long-run effects, collateral damage, migration, human capital, investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review