Cited by 227Political Conflict and GovernanceElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMiddle East Politics and Society

Horizontal Inequality, Crosscutting Cleavages, and Civil War

Gubler, Joshua R., Selway, Joel Sawat·2012·Journal of Conflict Resolution

Abstract

In this article, the authors bring together research on horizontal inequality, geographic dispersion of ethnic groups and crosscutting cleavages to present a more holistic theory of ethnic structure and civil war onset. The authors argue that rebel leaders are thwarted in their mobilization efforts in highly crosscutting societies due to a lower probability of potential combatants identifying with nationalist goals, decreased ability to exert social control, and diminished in-group communication. Using cross-national data from over 100 countries, the authors provide evidence that civil war onset is an average of nearly twelve times less probable in societies where ethnicity is crosscut by socioeconomic class, geographic region, and religion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002711431416

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Civil war is 12 times less probable in societies where ethnicity is cross-cut by another social identity such as class, geography, or religion.

    “scholars have found that civil war is 12 times less probable in societies where ethnicity is cross-cut by another social identity such as class, geography, or religion (ref. 45; see also refs. 46, 47).”

Cites

  • Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset

    GLEDITSCH, N. P., WALLENSTEEN, P., ERIKSSON, M., SOLLENBERG, M., & STRAND, H. (2002) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007 · Cited by 3,846 · cited 2× · see citing works

    “…State Failure Problem Set (Bates et al. 2003), Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP)/ Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) Armed Conflict Data set (Gleditsch et al. 2002), and Major Episodes of Political Violence (MEPV; Marshall 2005).15 These three data sets differ primarily in the threshold of…”
    BackgroundMethod
  • Ethnic Polarization, Potential Conflict, and Civil Wars

    Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828054201468 · Cited by 1,386 · cited 3× · see citing works

    “Results were mixed, however, even for studies that used similar measures (Collier and Hoeffler 1998, 2000, 2004; Fearon and Laitin 2003; Reynal-Querol 2002; Posner 2004; Montalvo and Reynal-Querol 2005; Kalyvas 2007; Fearon, Kasara, and Laitin 2007; Wimmer, Cederman, and Min 2009).”
    BackgroundResult

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gubler, J. R., & Selway, J. S.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Selway, Joel Sawat
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Published
2012-04
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
206-232
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
OpenAlex
W2155884724
Cited by
227
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
Keywords
horizontal inequality, civil war onset, ethnic composition, socioeconomic class, in-group communication, social control, ethnic conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review