Cited by 134Political Conflict and GovernanceChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign Policy

Focal Points, Dissident Calendars, and Preemptive Repression

Truex, Rory·2019·Journal of Conflict Resolution

Abstract

This article explains temporal variation in repression as a function of the “dissident calendar,” the set of events that serve as natural focal points for coordination. The core argument is that regimes can anticipate the events that create these focal points and engage in preemptive repression to survive their passing. This dynamic produces predictable, often cyclical patterns in repression. An analysis of dissident detentions in China from 1998 to 2014 shows that “focal events” alone appear to be responsible for more than 20 percent of dissident detentions over the analysis period. Such detentions tend to be shorter and rely less on formal criminal procedures, suggesting a “catch-and-release” dynamic. Additional analysis of detentions in Tibet shows how the calendar may vary by issue or group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022002718770520

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobilization organized through public coordination is repressed using that very same public information.

    “research has shown how mobilization organized through public coordination is repressed using that very same public information-for instance, repression is preemptively increased before focal days (Truex 2019); and autocracies censor online calls for collective action (King, Pan, and Roberts 2013), coerce online opinion leaders (Pan and Siegel 2020), and at times, turn off the internet entirely.”

    From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Truex 2019

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 134

Authors
Truex, R.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Truex, Rory
Venue
Journal of Conflict Resolution
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
1032-1052
ISSN
  • 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8766
OpenAlex
W3125233458
Cited by
134
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
22.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Conflict Resolution (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
Keywords
political repression, catch and release, regime survival, Tibet, China, dissidents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review