The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights
Abstract
This article offers an empirical description and discussion of interstate conflict behavior. The basis is a recently completed data set consisting of all recorded instances of threats, displays, and uses of military force among states since 1816. We detail historical trends in the data and describe major dimensions of dispute behavior, including patterns of participation, duration, severity and escalation, regional distribution, and national dispute proneness. The following conclusions are suggested: First, patterns of dispute behavior have been more persistent over time than we often assume. Second, when these patterns have changed, the changes have been evolutionary in nature and have paralleled changes in the size and composition of the interstate system. Third, despite the diversity of the political units that constitute the interstate system, patterns of dispute behavior are generalizable across geographic boundaries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bull, H. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-39340-0 · Cited by 3,316
Bull, H. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9 · Cited by 3,316
Cited by
Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset
GLEDITSCH, N. P., WALLENSTEEN, P., ERIKSSON, M., SOLLENBERG, M., & STRAND, H. (2002) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007 · Cited by 3,846
Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics
Thompson, W. R. (2001) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00214 · Cited by 490
Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict
Mansfield, E. D., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2000) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081800551361 · Cited by 384
Sanctions, Signals, and Militarized Conflict
Lektzian, D. J., & Sprecher, C. M. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00259.x · Cited by 127
Escalation Risks from Language Models in Military and Diplomatic Decision-Making
Rivera, J.-P., Mukobi, G., Reuel, A., Lamparth, M., Smith, C., & Schneider, J. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658942 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Gochman, C. S., & Maoz, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 585-616
- ISSN
- 0022-0027 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8766
- OpenAlex
- W2128786629
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 85.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022002784028004002
- The paper
- Gochman, C. S., & Maoz, Z. (1984). Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816-1976: Procedures, Patterns, and Insights. Journal of Conflict Resolution. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002784028004002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.