The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups
Abstract
Social science theories and empirical data on perceptions of environmental risk have focused almost exclusively on factors related to frequently occurring disagreements between the lay population and technical experts. Discussions of variability within the nonexpert population itself are uncommon, even though theories of risk and culture, as well as empirical evidence, suggest that significant differences in judgments may occur within a diverse population such as that in the United States. Perceptions of risk are influenced, in part, by characteristic ways in which situations of uncertainty are framed and interpreted. Because culturally based attitudes and values can influence general orientation toward risk and uncertainty, it is reasonable to expect that factors differentiating individuals on the basis of shared experiences, values, and beliefs relevant to risk evaluation will be associated with nonequivalent perceptions in many situations. One such variable, ethnicity, is examined for its association with variability in perceptions of environmental risk. The authors review available evidence indicating when ethnic differences in risk perceptions have been observed, and consider three hypotheses that could explain why ethnicity would be predictive of dissimilarities in judgments for many environmental risks. Possible explanations for an ethnicity effect include differences in prior experiences with or exposure to various hazards, dissimilar general beliefs about risk and uncertainty, and differences on various qualitative dimensions that influence nonexpert assessments of risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Cited by
Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1006/enrs.1998.3940 · Cited by 1,187
Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution
Bickerstaff, K. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001 · Cited by 472
Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research
Boholm, A. (1998) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/136698798377231 · Cited by 465
Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida's single family homeowners
Peacock, W. G., Brody, S. D., & Highfield, W. (2005) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004 · Cited by 400
Donner, W., & Rodriguez, H. (2008) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.0.0141 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaughan, E., & Nordenstam, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-60
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2155189539
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022022191221005
- The paper
- Vaughan, E., & Nordenstam, B. (1991). The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191221005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.